Potential negative friction coefficient predicted by first-principles calculations: A possible consequence of inaccurate computational models

The groundbreaking discovery of a negative friction coefficient (NCOF) challenges the long-held classic Amonton's law, ushering in fresh perspectives for comprehending and manipulating friction. Nevertheless, contradictory results about the NCOF have been recently reported by static first-principles calculations, which could foster misconceptions regarding the fundamental physics underlying this intriguing phenomenon. Here, we identify that disparities in computational models used in static friction calculations serve as the pivotal factor causing these inconsistencies through meticulous reproduction and comparison of the contradictory results. Specifically, the NCOF predicted by static first-principles in two-dimensional lamellar materials result from the overlooking of the pivotal role of the work done by the load during sliding. We further verify the indispensability of the work done by the load through theoretically scrutinizing the sliding process under constant load and under constant distance. Our findings propose a correct way for computing friction forces with static simulations, thereby advancing the scientific understanding and practical applications of frictional behavior in various materials systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. B./Physical review. B
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.111.054109
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Brake Systems and Friction Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potential negative friction coefficient predicted by first-principles calculations: A possible consequence of inaccurate computational models

Zhen-hua Zhao, Qiuchen Lv, Zhibin Lu, Xiangcheng Dong et al.
6 citations
Physical review. B./Physical review. B
Brake Systems and Friction Analysis
4.10
article

Potential negative friction coefficient predicted by first-principles calculations: A possible consequence of inaccurate computational models

Zhen-hua Zhao, Qiuchen Lv, Zhibin Lu, Xiangcheng Dong, Yuan Niu, Wenhao He, Yunfeng Wang, Yu Cao
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The groundbreaking discovery of a negative friction coefficient (NCOF) challenges the long-held classic Amonton's law, ushering in fresh perspectives for comprehending and manipulating friction. Nevertheless, contradictory results about the NCOF have been recently reported by static first-principles calculations, which could foster misconceptions regarding the fundamental physics underlying this intriguing phenomenon. Here, we identify that disparities in computational models used in static friction calculations serve as the pivotal factor causing these inconsistencies through meticulous reproduction and comparison of the contradictory results. Specifically, the NCOF predicted by static first-principles in two-dimensional lamellar materials result from the overlooking of the pivotal role of the work done by the load during sliding. We further verify the indispensability of the work done by the load through theoretically scrutinizing the sliding process under constant load and under constant distance. Our findings propose a correct way for computing friction forces with static simulations, thereby advancing the scientific understanding and practical applications of frictional behavior in various materials systems.

Physical review. B./Physical review. BVol. 111(5)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Lanzhou Jiaotong University (CN), Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics (CN), Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), State Key Laboratory of Solid Lubrication
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Brake Systems and Friction Analysis
4.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.