Perspectives on Ultraprocessed Food Research

Beginning in 2009, a body of research in nutrition science emerged that focused on the health impacts associated with consuming foods labeled “ultraprocessed.” Since then, several organizations have proffered classification systems to categorize foods by degree of processing. However, to date, there is no recognized method to consistently and accurately apply these systems, including the Nova classification system, in research. This lack of consistency inhibits the ability of the scientific community to synthesize evidence-based conclusions about the impact of processed foods on health. Nonetheless, this body of work has impacted food policy globally. Continuous refinement of the definition of ultraprocessed foods, as well as a consistent use and implementation of a single definition across research studies, is necessary to build a robust evidence base and determine next steps needed for public health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrition Today
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/nt.0000000000000740
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives on Ultraprocessed Food Research

Julie Hess, Claudia PromSchmidt, Danielle Villano
2 citations
Nutrition Today
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
3.76
article

Perspectives on Ultraprocessed Food Research

Julie Hess, Claudia PromSchmidt, Danielle Villano
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Beginning in 2009, a body of research in nutrition science emerged that focused on the health impacts associated with consuming foods labeled “ultraprocessed.” Since then, several organizations have proffered classification systems to categorize foods by degree of processing. However, to date, there is no recognized method to consistently and accurately apply these systems, including the Nova classification system, in research. This lack of consistency inhibits the ability of the scientific community to synthesize evidence-based conclusions about the impact of processed foods on health. Nonetheless, this body of work has impacted food policy globally. Continuous refinement of the definition of ultraprocessed foods, as well as a consistent use and implementation of a single definition across research studies, is necessary to build a robust evidence base and determine next steps needed for public health.

Nutrition Today
University of North Dakota (US), Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center (US), Information Today (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.