How final is final: The production and perception of utterance-medial and utterance-final boundaries

We examine the production and perception of two types of phrase-final prosodic boundaries, specifically, utterance-medial and utterance-final intonation phrase (IP) boundaries in German. These two types of boundaries are expected to differ in terms of general properties of the prosodic hierarchy, and properties of turn-taking and speech planning. In an articulatory magnetometer study and a perceptual rating study, we examine these boundaries in read speech, testing for temporal, spatial, and intonational properties of the boundaries. Only small and inconsistent differences were found in the temporal and spatial domains. The only robust difference is a lower f0 in the rhyme of the intonation contour for utterance-final IP boundaries compared to utterance-medial IP boundaries for five of the eight speakers. This is consistent with the results of the perception study, which indicate that listeners perceive subtle differences in the boundary-specific production, and that mean f0 during the rhyme and peak velocity were the information listeners used to determine utterance finality for the speakers producing the difference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Laboratory Phonology Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.16995/labphon.11679
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How final is final: The production and perception of utterance-medial and utterance-final boundaries

Jelena Krivokapić, Christine Mooshammer, Malte Belz
Laboratory Phonology Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

How final is final: The production and perception of utterance-medial and utterance-final boundaries

Jelena Krivokapić, Christine Mooshammer, Malte Belz
article en

Abstract

We examine the production and perception of two types of phrase-final prosodic boundaries, specifically, utterance-medial and utterance-final intonation phrase (IP) boundaries in German. These two types of boundaries are expected to differ in terms of general properties of the prosodic hierarchy, and properties of turn-taking and speech planning. In an articulatory magnetometer study and a perceptual rating study, we examine these boundaries in read speech, testing for temporal, spatial, and intonational properties of the boundaries. Only small and inconsistent differences were found in the temporal and spatial domains. The only robust difference is a lower f0 in the rhyme of the intonation contour for utterance-final IP boundaries compared to utterance-medial IP boundaries for five of the eight speakers. This is consistent with the results of the perception study, which indicate that listeners perceive subtle differences in the boundary-specific production, and that mean f0 during the rhyme and peak velocity were the information listeners used to determine utterance finality for the speakers producing the difference.

Laboratory Phonology Journal of the Association for Laboratory PhonologyVol. 16(1)
University of Michigan (US), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How final is final: The production and perception of utterance-medial and utterance-final boundaries — Jelena Krivokapić, Christine Mooshammer, et al. · Laboratory Phonology Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS