Do fees matter? Investor’s sensitivity to active management fees

Following the framework established by Berk and Green (2004), mutual fund inflows and fees should be uncorrelated at equilibrium. We empirically explore this relationship by investigating the temporal changes in fund fees and flows. Our fee metrics focus on active management services rather than diversification. We analyze the additional fee compared to passive alternatives and additional fee per unit of active management, along with the traditionally used total fee. Our analysis of global data reveals a negative time series correlation between both measures of active management fee and fund flows. • Fees are important for the value creation of active management. • We examine whether active fund flows are sensitive to changes in fees. • We find that changes in total fees are not essential for fund flows. • More important are excess and active fee (excess divided by active share). • Investors are more sensitive to active fees in countries with many index funds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Empirical Finance
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2025.101596
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do fees matter? Investor’s sensitivity to active management fees

André Wattø Sjuve, Andreas Ørpetveit, Trond Døskeland
Journal of Empirical Finance
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

Do fees matter? Investor’s sensitivity to active management fees

André Wattø Sjuve, Andreas Ørpetveit, Trond Døskeland
article en

Abstract

Following the framework established by Berk and Green (2004), mutual fund inflows and fees should be uncorrelated at equilibrium. We empirically explore this relationship by investigating the temporal changes in fund fees and flows. Our fee metrics focus on active management services rather than diversification. We analyze the additional fee compared to passive alternatives and additional fee per unit of active management, along with the traditionally used total fee. Our analysis of global data reveals a negative time series correlation between both measures of active management fee and fund flows. • Fees are important for the value creation of active management. • We examine whether active fund flows are sensitive to changes in fees. • We find that changes in total fees are not essential for fund flows. • More important are excess and active fee (excess divided by active share). • Investors are more sensitive to active fees in countries with many index funds.

Journal of Empirical FinanceVol. 81
Norwegian School of Economics (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.