Lifetime financial analysis of a model predictive control retrofit for integrated PV-battery systems in commercial buildings

As electrical grids decarbonise, the need for flexible, real-time energy management systems becomes crucial to handle the variability of renewable sources. This paper investigates the lifetime performance of a commercial PV-battery system under three potential control approaches. Two rule-based controllers and one economic MPC approach are simulated over the lifetime of the battery, considering both the upfront capital and ongoing operational costs. Under the nominal rule-based control, installing the battery system saves 2.9% in operational costs per year. An informed rule-based schedule was then created, based on observing the typical PV and building loads and electricity price dynamics, increasing savings to 4.3%. These additional savings can be realised without any additional capital or operational investment. A supervisory MPC approach is integrated with the existing system control, requiring an upfront investment of $13.7k, combined with additional operational costs of $5.89k/yr. Accounting for these additional costs, net operational savings increase to 6% compared to the baseline operation without a battery system, while also reducing carbon emissions by 9.8%. MPC savings increase to 13.2% when considering the volatile electricity prices seen during the 2022 energy crisis. Despite these encouraging savings, current battery systems remain financially unattractive due to their high upfront cost, and all three control scenarios result in a negative NPV. A sensitivity analysis demonstrates that optimal sizing of batteries and reductions in their cost are the most significant factors when evaluating the lifetime performance of PV-battery systems. • Capital and operating costs for deploying MPC with PV-battery systems are analysed. • Sensitivity analysis performed to understand MPC performance under different conditions. • MPC reduces operating costs by 6% compared to 4.3% for informed rule-based control. • MPC improves with reduced battery costs and increased electricity price volatility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy and Buildings
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115459
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Smart Grid Energy Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lifetime financial analysis of a model predictive control retrofit for integrated PV-battery systems in commercial buildings

Max Bird, Salvador Acha, Nilay Shah, Reewa Andraos
11 citations
Energy and Buildings
Smart Grid Energy Management
8.03
article

Lifetime financial analysis of a model predictive control retrofit for integrated PV-battery systems in commercial buildings

Max Bird, Salvador Acha, Nilay Shah, Reewa Andraos
article en
11 citations

Abstract

As electrical grids decarbonise, the need for flexible, real-time energy management systems becomes crucial to handle the variability of renewable sources. This paper investigates the lifetime performance of a commercial PV-battery system under three potential control approaches. Two rule-based controllers and one economic MPC approach are simulated over the lifetime of the battery, considering both the upfront capital and ongoing operational costs. Under the nominal rule-based control, installing the battery system saves 2.9% in operational costs per year. An informed rule-based schedule was then created, based on observing the typical PV and building loads and electricity price dynamics, increasing savings to 4.3%. These additional savings can be realised without any additional capital or operational investment. A supervisory MPC approach is integrated with the existing system control, requiring an upfront investment of $13.7k, combined with additional operational costs of $5.89k/yr. Accounting for these additional costs, net operational savings increase to 6% compared to the baseline operation without a battery system, while also reducing carbon emissions by 9.8%. MPC savings increase to 13.2% when considering the volatile electricity prices seen during the 2022 energy crisis. Despite these encouraging savings, current battery systems remain financially unattractive due to their high upfront cost, and all three control scenarios result in a negative NPV. A sensitivity analysis demonstrates that optimal sizing of batteries and reductions in their cost are the most significant factors when evaluating the lifetime performance of PV-battery systems. • Capital and operating costs for deploying MPC with PV-battery systems are analysed. • Sensitivity analysis performed to understand MPC performance under different conditions. • MPC reduces operating costs by 6% compared to 4.3% for informed rule-based control. • MPC improves with reduced battery costs and increased electricity price volatility.

Energy and BuildingsVol. 332
Imperial College London (GB), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (FR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Smart Grid Energy Management
8.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.