The role of small structures for stoats in agricultural landscapes

• Small structures like branch and stone piles enhance farmland habitat conditions. • Although often recommended for small mustelids, their effects remain understudied. • Stone piles benefit stoats in the agricultural landscape. • Larger piles and higher number of piles in a 100 m radius positively affect stoats. The installation of small structures such as branch and stone piles has been recommended by experts for enhancing habitat conditions for biodiversity in intensively used agricultural landscapes, particularly for stoat ( Mustela erminea ) and weasel ( Mustela nivalis ). However, quantitative evidence regarding the effectiveness of such structures is lacking. In this study we investigated the influence of small structures and other surrounding landscape elements on these two mustelid species across the Swiss lowland agricultural landscape. Over the course of two years (2022 and 2023), we used scat-detection dogs, visual scat surveys, and camera traps to sample populations of these species in 420 plots distributed across 28 study sites. Of these plots, 187 harboured a branch pile, 94 a stone pile, while 139 had no small structure. Overall, when considering both scat and camera trap data, stoats were detected at 26 of 420 (6.2%) plots, but only one weasel was recorded, indicating a low mustelid occurrence across our sampling sites. Multi-scale linear models revealed a significant positive effect of small structures on stoat abundance and a preference for stone piles over branch piles. Forest negatively affected stoat occurrence, possibly reflecting a preference for open habitat where small rodents thrive, notably water voles and common voles. Our results underscore the importance of retaining or reinstating small structures, in particular stone piles, in the agricultural landscape to support stoat populations. Nevertheless, we call for ensuring the presence of both stone and branch piles to provide habitat features benefitting a diverse array of species.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for Nature Conservation
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126865
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ecology and biodiversity studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of small structures for stoats in agricultural landscapes

Gerald Heckel, Jean‐Yves Humbert, Denise Karp, Andrin C. Dürst et al.
3 citations
Journal for Nature Conservation
Ecology and biodiversity studies
5.15
article

The role of small structures for stoats in agricultural landscapes

Gerald Heckel, Jean‐Yves Humbert, Denise Karp, Andrin C. Dürst, Gregory B. Egloff, Laurent Schenker, Sandra Riverendo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Small structures like branch and stone piles enhance farmland habitat conditions. • Although often recommended for small mustelids, their effects remain understudied. • Stone piles benefit stoats in the agricultural landscape. • Larger piles and higher number of piles in a 100 m radius positively affect stoats. The installation of small structures such as branch and stone piles has been recommended by experts for enhancing habitat conditions for biodiversity in intensively used agricultural landscapes, particularly for stoat ( Mustela erminea ) and weasel ( Mustela nivalis ). However, quantitative evidence regarding the effectiveness of such structures is lacking. In this study we investigated the influence of small structures and other surrounding landscape elements on these two mustelid species across the Swiss lowland agricultural landscape. Over the course of two years (2022 and 2023), we used scat-detection dogs, visual scat surveys, and camera traps to sample populations of these species in 420 plots distributed across 28 study sites. Of these plots, 187 harboured a branch pile, 94 a stone pile, while 139 had no small structure. Overall, when considering both scat and camera trap data, stoats were detected at 26 of 420 (6.2%) plots, but only one weasel was recorded, indicating a low mustelid occurrence across our sampling sites. Multi-scale linear models revealed a significant positive effect of small structures on stoat abundance and a preference for stone piles over branch piles. Forest negatively affected stoat occurrence, possibly reflecting a preference for open habitat where small rodents thrive, notably water voles and common voles. Our results underscore the importance of retaining or reinstating small structures, in particular stone piles, in the agricultural landscape to support stoat populations. Nevertheless, we call for ensuring the presence of both stone and branch piles to provide habitat features benefitting a diverse array of species.

Journal for Nature ConservationVol. 85
University of Bern (CH), Swiss Institute for Art Research (CH)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ecology and biodiversity studies
5.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.