Recovered memory practices in Ireland: public & professional perspectives
We surveyed members of the public and professionals to assess opinions and experiences related to recovered memories in Ireland (<i>N</i> = 675). We found that memory recovery amongst therapy-goers in Ireland is relatively common (8%). Likewise, many practitioners (29%) reported some experience with a client recovering a memory and most had actually recovered a memory themselves. However, both groups struggled with definitions of recovered memories: initially reporting inflated figures (19% & 84%, respectively) that incorporated normal, non-repression-related memory mechanisms. Working therapists and current trainees reported a profound lack of training in this area. We also replicated a previously demonstrated scientist-practitioner divide, where researchers were more likely than practitioners to endorse the fallibility of memory. Though the study related to a sensitive topic, both professionals and members of the public reported enjoying the survey and did not find the questions distressing or ethically problematic - encouraging for future research in this field.
Authors
- Gillian Murphy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8898-139X)
- Michelle Kerin
- Christian Ryan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4940-1377)
- Maria Dempsey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7001-0568)
- Owen Coyle
Institutions
- University College Cork (IE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Memory
- Published
- 2025-02-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2025.2462645
- Citations
- 6
- Primary Topic
- Cambodian History and Society
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 25.21