Recovered memory practices in Ireland: public & professional perspectives

We surveyed members of the public and professionals to assess opinions and experiences related to recovered memories in Ireland (<i>N</i> = 675). We found that memory recovery amongst therapy-goers in Ireland is relatively common (8%). Likewise, many practitioners (29%) reported some experience with a client recovering a memory and most had actually recovered a memory themselves. However, both groups struggled with definitions of recovered memories: initially reporting inflated figures (19% & 84%, respectively) that incorporated normal, non-repression-related memory mechanisms. Working therapists and current trainees reported a profound lack of training in this area. We also replicated a previously demonstrated scientist-practitioner divide, where researchers were more likely than practitioners to endorse the fallibility of memory. Though the study related to a sensitive topic, both professionals and members of the public reported enjoying the survey and did not find the questions distressing or ethically problematic - encouraging for future research in this field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Memory
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2025.2462645
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Cambodian History and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recovered memory practices in Ireland: public & professional perspectives

Gillian Murphy, Michelle Kerin, Christian Ryan, Maria Dempsey et al.
6 citations
Memory
Cambodian History and Society
25.21
article

Recovered memory practices in Ireland: public & professional perspectives

Gillian Murphy, Michelle Kerin, Christian Ryan, Maria Dempsey, Owen Coyle
article en
6 citations

Abstract

We surveyed members of the public and professionals to assess opinions and experiences related to recovered memories in Ireland (<i>N</i> = 675). We found that memory recovery amongst therapy-goers in Ireland is relatively common (8%). Likewise, many practitioners (29%) reported some experience with a client recovering a memory and most had actually recovered a memory themselves. However, both groups struggled with definitions of recovered memories: initially reporting inflated figures (19% & 84%, respectively) that incorporated normal, non-repression-related memory mechanisms. Working therapists and current trainees reported a profound lack of training in this area. We also replicated a previously demonstrated scientist-practitioner divide, where researchers were more likely than practitioners to endorse the fallibility of memory. Though the study related to a sensitive topic, both professionals and members of the public reported enjoying the survey and did not find the questions distressing or ethically problematic - encouraging for future research in this field.

MemoryVol. 33(4)
University College Cork (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Cambodian History and Society
25.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.