Conditional inclusion? Conflicting representations, configurations and encounters in East London

This article utilises Vertovec’s framework on the social organisation of difference to explore how contrasting configurations and representations of diversity within an East London borough contribute to unwelcoming interactions between service providers and newcomers. While East London is celebrated for its diversity and conviviality, its urban spaces–which often serve as arenas for encounters and exchanges among varied residents–can also become sites of tension. Based on ethnographic research, the paper investigates the disconnect between the inclusive image promoted by the local authority and the disadvantaged realities experienced by some residents due to precarious legal status and limited cultural capital. It argues that, as a result, despite public narratives of inclusion, everyday interactions can marginalise vulnerable newcomers, even within services intended to be inclusive. Applying Vertovec’s framework, the article highlights how subtle aspects of difference in superdiverse urban areas can perpetuate social inequalities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethnic and Racial Studies
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2025.2461247
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conditional inclusion? Conflicting representations, configurations and encounters in East London

Susanne Wessendorf, Tamlyn Monson
3 citations
Ethnic and Racial Studies
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
12.60
article

Conditional inclusion? Conflicting representations, configurations and encounters in East London

Susanne Wessendorf, Tamlyn Monson
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article utilises Vertovec’s framework on the social organisation of difference to explore how contrasting configurations and representations of diversity within an East London borough contribute to unwelcoming interactions between service providers and newcomers. While East London is celebrated for its diversity and conviviality, its urban spaces–which often serve as arenas for encounters and exchanges among varied residents–can also become sites of tension. Based on ethnographic research, the paper investigates the disconnect between the inclusive image promoted by the local authority and the disadvantaged realities experienced by some residents due to precarious legal status and limited cultural capital. It argues that, as a result, despite public narratives of inclusion, everyday interactions can marginalise vulnerable newcomers, even within services intended to be inclusive. Applying Vertovec’s framework, the article highlights how subtle aspects of difference in superdiverse urban areas can perpetuate social inequalities.

Ethnic and Racial StudiesVol. 48(9)
Coventry University (GB)
European Commission, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Economic and Social Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.