Uncertainty in automated stenosis quantification using multiview x-ray coronary angiography videos

The visual interpretation of X-ray coronary angiography, the primary imaging modality for coronary stenosis evaluation, is a difficult task and requires experience and expert knowledge. Automating stenosis assessment can improve confidence in stenosis identification and severity estimation, facilitating decisions regarding revascularization strategies. However, existing methods are predominantly limited to static images or single-view videos, which increases the risk of missing crucial information due to the complex structure of the coronary tree and movement of the heart. We propose a five-step workflow for automated stenosis detection, localization and severity estimation in X-ray angiography videos. For evaluation at the patient-level, multiple videos per patient, captured from different views, were considered. The workflow achieved an overall sensitivity of 58.98% and specificity of 84.15% for stenosis prediction per coronary segment. Sensitivity and specificity for stenosis severity classification were 62.75% and 59.72%, respectively. To assess the impact of multi-view analysis, we compared severity estimation performance for stenoses detected in single- and multi-view projections, demonstrating that only one view is associated with the highest uncertainty. Our findings encourage further refinement and development of the workflow and highlight the importance of multi-view consideration for accurate stenosis evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3045410
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty in automated stenosis quantification using multiview x-ray coronary angiography videos

Marie Hoffmann, Jörg Kempfert, Anja Hennemuth, A. Popp et al.
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Uncertainty in automated stenosis quantification using multiview x-ray coronary angiography videos

Marie Hoffmann, Jörg Kempfert, Anja Hennemuth, A. Popp, A. Laube, Alexander Meyer, Alaa Abd El Al
article en

Abstract

The visual interpretation of X-ray coronary angiography, the primary imaging modality for coronary stenosis evaluation, is a difficult task and requires experience and expert knowledge. Automating stenosis assessment can improve confidence in stenosis identification and severity estimation, facilitating decisions regarding revascularization strategies. However, existing methods are predominantly limited to static images or single-view videos, which increases the risk of missing crucial information due to the complex structure of the coronary tree and movement of the heart. We propose a five-step workflow for automated stenosis detection, localization and severity estimation in X-ray angiography videos. For evaluation at the patient-level, multiple videos per patient, captured from different views, were considered. The workflow achieved an overall sensitivity of 58.98% and specificity of 84.15% for stenosis prediction per coronary segment. Sensitivity and specificity for stenosis severity classification were 62.75% and 59.72%, respectively. To assess the impact of multi-view analysis, we compared severity estimation performance for stenoses detected in single- and multi-view projections, demonstrating that only one view is associated with the highest uncertainty. Our findings encourage further refinement and development of the workflow and highlight the importance of multi-view consideration for accurate stenosis evaluation.

Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DE), German Cardiac Society (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.