Pitfalls with anomaly detection for breast cancer risk prediction

Breast cancer has the highest prevalence in the world, and thus, most countries have screening programs which aim to detect the cancer onset early. In these screening programs, negative studies dominate the dataset. Unsu- pervised anomaly detection promises to take advantage of the negative studies by using it to detect abnormalities as cancer or signs of cancer onset. In this study, we evaluate an anomaly detection method for cancer predic- tion (1-year ahead) on a MRI dataset of a high risk cohort with BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations. As the approach fails to predict cancer risk on the dataset, we investigate the intrinsic behavior of the method. Our analysis reveals, that the reconstruction based method might only detect high intensity anomalies and that the reconstruction quality is highly correlated with noisy patterns in the image patches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3047285
Primary Topic
Gene expression and cancer classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pitfalls with anomaly detection for breast cancer risk prediction

Michael Ingrisch, Heba Amer, Eva Maria Fallenberg, Horst K. Hahn et al.
Gene expression and cancer classification
article

Pitfalls with anomaly detection for breast cancer risk prediction

Michael Ingrisch, Heba Amer, Eva Maria Fallenberg, Horst K. Hahn, Georg Langs, Tom L. Koller, Ani Ambroladze, Kai Geißler, Phillip Seeböck
article en

Abstract

Breast cancer has the highest prevalence in the world, and thus, most countries have screening programs which aim to detect the cancer onset early. In these screening programs, negative studies dominate the dataset. Unsu- pervised anomaly detection promises to take advantage of the negative studies by using it to detect abnormalities as cancer or signs of cancer onset. In this study, we evaluate an anomaly detection method for cancer predic- tion (1-year ahead) on a MRI dataset of a high risk cohort with BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations. As the approach fails to predict cancer risk on the dataset, we investigate the intrinsic behavior of the method. Our analysis reveals, that the reconstruction based method might only detect high intensity anomalies and that the reconstruction quality is highly correlated with noisy patterns in the image patches.

University of Bremen (DE), Zagazig University (EG), Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Gene expression and cancer classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.