A comprehensive scoping review of methodological approaches and clinical applications of tear fluid biomarkers

Tear fluid is an emerging source of disease biomarkers, drawing attention due to its quick, inexpensive, and non-invasive collection. The advancements in detection techniques enable the measurement of ultra-low biomarker levels from small sample volumes typical of tear fluid. The lack of standardized protocols for collection, processing, and analysis of tear fluid remains a significant challenge. To address this, we convened the Tear Research Network Review Taskforce in 2022 to review protocols from the past three decades, providing a comprehensive overview of the methodologies used in tear fluid biomarker research. A total of 1484 articles published from January 1974 to May 2024 from two electronic databases, Embase and Ovid MEDLINE, were reviewed. An exponential increase in the number of articles on tear fluid biomarkers was observed from 2015 onwards. The two most commonly reported collection methods were; glass capillaries (45.2%), and Schirmer's strips (25%), with glass capillary tube collection remaining the most frequent method until 2019, when Schirmer's strips became the leading method. Most articles analyzed tear fluid proteins (65%) and focused on a single analyte (32.3%). In recent years, an increase was observed in the type and number of examined analytes. The differences in the reported methodologies and protocols underscore the need for standardization and harmonization within the field of tear fluid biomarkers to minimize methodological differences and reduce variability in clinical outcomes. Consistent and detailed reporting is essential for improving the reproducibility and validity of tear fluid studies, in order to advance their potential clinical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2025.101338
Citations
30
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
56.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comprehensive scoping review of methodological approaches and clinical applications of tear fluid biomarkers

Marcela Huertas-Bello, Nikolay Boychev, Sònia Travé‐Huarte, Rosa Fernandes et al.
30 citations
Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
56.36
article

A comprehensive scoping review of methodological approaches and clinical applications of tear fluid biomarkers

Marcela Huertas-Bello, Nikolay Boychev, Sònia Travé‐Huarte, Rosa Fernandes, Nienke van de Sande, Shruti Sharma, Marlies Gijs, Clémence Bonnet, Jeremy Chung Bo Chiang, Jente Schmeetz
article en
30 citations

Abstract

Tear fluid is an emerging source of disease biomarkers, drawing attention due to its quick, inexpensive, and non-invasive collection. The advancements in detection techniques enable the measurement of ultra-low biomarker levels from small sample volumes typical of tear fluid. The lack of standardized protocols for collection, processing, and analysis of tear fluid remains a significant challenge. To address this, we convened the Tear Research Network Review Taskforce in 2022 to review protocols from the past three decades, providing a comprehensive overview of the methodologies used in tear fluid biomarker research. A total of 1484 articles published from January 1974 to May 2024 from two electronic databases, Embase and Ovid MEDLINE, were reviewed. An exponential increase in the number of articles on tear fluid biomarkers was observed from 2015 onwards. The two most commonly reported collection methods were; glass capillaries (45.2%), and Schirmer's strips (25%), with glass capillary tube collection remaining the most frequent method until 2019, when Schirmer's strips became the leading method. Most articles analyzed tear fluid proteins (65%) and focused on a single analyte (32.3%). In recent years, an increase was observed in the type and number of examined analytes. The differences in the reported methodologies and protocols underscore the need for standardization and harmonization within the field of tear fluid biomarkers to minimize methodological differences and reduce variability in clinical outcomes. Consistent and detailed reporting is essential for improving the reproducibility and validity of tear fluid studies, in order to advance their potential clinical applications.

Progress in Retinal and Eye ResearchVol. 106
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (US), University of Miami (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Aston University (GB), Augusta University (US), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Australian College of Optometry (AU), Maastricht University (NL), Augusta University Health (US), Doheny Eye Institute (US), University of Coimbra (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
56.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.