A Conflicting Evidence Fusion Method Based on Game Theory Combination Weighting

This essay introduces a new approach to address the challenges of applying Dempster-Shafer evidence theory to tackling high-conflict evidence. We first employed Jousselme’s distance and compatibility coefficients to measure confidence and support, then converted these values into vectors. Next, we applied game theory to convert the vectors into a system of linear equations,from which we obtained a corresponding combination of weight coefficients that we used to modify the initial evidence. Finally, we applied the Dempster-Shafer combination rule to achieve evidence fusion. A case analysis shows that our proposed method provides more sensible fusion results for high-conflict evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccvit63928.2024.10872552
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Decision-Making Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Conflicting Evidence Fusion Method Based on Game Theory Combination Weighting

Ziye Wang, Jianyu Xiao
1 citations
Advanced Decision-Making Techniques
0.78
article

A Conflicting Evidence Fusion Method Based on Game Theory Combination Weighting

Ziye Wang, Jianyu Xiao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This essay introduces a new approach to address the challenges of applying Dempster-Shafer evidence theory to tackling high-conflict evidence. We first employed Jousselme’s distance and compatibility coefficients to measure confidence and support, then converted these values into vectors. Next, we applied game theory to convert the vectors into a system of linear equations,from which we obtained a corresponding combination of weight coefficients that we used to modify the initial evidence. Finally, we applied the Dempster-Shafer combination rule to achieve evidence fusion. A case analysis shows that our proposed method provides more sensible fusion results for high-conflict evidence.

Huaibei Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Advanced Decision-Making Techniques
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.