Fast Identification of the Jiles–Atherton Model Parameters and the Electrical Conductivity Based on Gaussian Process Regression

Various approaches already exist for identifying the Jiles-Atherton (JA) hysteresis model, typically using optimization algorithms that minimize the deviation of hysteresis curves from a reference trajectory to approximate suitable parameters. However, depending on the implementation of the JA model and the optimization algorithm, this approach can be computationally intensive. Therefore, a data-driven approach based on the Gaussian process regression (GPR) is investigated. Using numerical simulations, B(H) curves of toroidal core samples are initially generated. Hysteresis and eddy current effects are considered through the use of electromagnetically coupled Maxwell equations and the JA model. By varying JA parameters, core geometry, and electrical excitation, a dataset of B(H) loops for different materials and different test configurations is created. The resulting dataset serves as input for GPR models which predict JA parameters and electrical conductivity based on hysteresis curves and boundary conditions. The GPR models achieves strong regression performance with <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$R^{2}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> values of up to 0.999. Overall, this approach can reliably estimate the JA parameters and the conductivity of the material based on the hysteresis curve as well as the geometrical and electrical boundary conditions. The estimation of the parameters occurs with minimal temporal delay and is universally applicable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2025.3541244
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fault Detection and Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fast Identification of the Jiles–Atherton Model Parameters and the Electrical Conductivity Based on Gaussian Process Regression

Nejila Parspour, Yuancong Gong, Adrian Schäfer
2 citations
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
Fault Detection and Control Systems
2.43
article

Fast Identification of the Jiles–Atherton Model Parameters and the Electrical Conductivity Based on Gaussian Process Regression

Nejila Parspour, Yuancong Gong, Adrian Schäfer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Various approaches already exist for identifying the Jiles-Atherton (JA) hysteresis model, typically using optimization algorithms that minimize the deviation of hysteresis curves from a reference trajectory to approximate suitable parameters. However, depending on the implementation of the JA model and the optimization algorithm, this approach can be computationally intensive. Therefore, a data-driven approach based on the Gaussian process regression (GPR) is investigated. Using numerical simulations, B(H) curves of toroidal core samples are initially generated. Hysteresis and eddy current effects are considered through the use of electromagnetically coupled Maxwell equations and the JA model. By varying JA parameters, core geometry, and electrical excitation, a dataset of B(H) loops for different materials and different test configurations is created. The resulting dataset serves as input for GPR models which predict JA parameters and electrical conductivity based on hysteresis curves and boundary conditions. The GPR models achieves strong regression performance with <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$R^{2}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> values of up to 0.999. Overall, this approach can reliably estimate the JA parameters and the conductivity of the material based on the hysteresis curve as well as the geometrical and electrical boundary conditions. The estimation of the parameters occurs with minimal temporal delay and is universally applicable.

IEEE Transactions on MagneticsVol. 61(9)
University of Stuttgart (DE)
Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Fault Detection and Control Systems
2.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fast Identification of the Jiles–Atherton Model Parameters and the Electrical Conductivity Based on Gaussian Process Regression — Nejila Parspour, Yuancong Gong, et al. · IEEE Transactions on Magnetics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS