Precision livestock farming usage among a subset of U.S. swine producers: Insights through a structural equation modeling approach

There is limited information about which factors influence the use and intention to use Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) technologies in livestock farming. Effective interventions that address the enablers and barriers to using PLF require a theoretical model to identify these factors. We empirically evaluated the Capability Opportunity Motivation Behavior (COM-B) model using US swine producers as a case study. Specifically, we tested the COM-B model as a framework for planning interventions in two behavioral contexts: PLF usage and the intention to use PLF. Our cross-sectional survey involved 53 swine producers from Iowa, Michigan, and North Carolina. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to specify and test the models. Most participants were male, aged 31–50, with extensive farming experience. Awareness was high for electronic sow feeders (ESF), radio frequency identification (RFID), and weighing scales but lower for other technologies. Over one-third currently use PLF, with many non-users open to future adoption. Capability positively influences PLF usage, while motivation mediates the effect of opportunity, with high costs deterring usage. Effective interventions should address cost concerns and focus on animal welfare to promote efficient, welfare-friendly swine production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart Agricultural Technology
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2025.100839
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Precision livestock farming usage among a subset of U.S. swine producers: Insights through a structural equation modeling approach

Faiçal Akaichi, Simon P. Turner, Janice M. Siegford, Babatope Ebenezer Akinyemi et al.
6 citations
Smart Agricultural Technology
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
14.13
article

Precision livestock farming usage among a subset of U.S. swine producers: Insights through a structural equation modeling approach

Faiçal Akaichi, Simon P. Turner, Janice M. Siegford, Babatope Ebenezer Akinyemi, Anna K. Johnson, Lesley Jessiman
article en
6 citations

Abstract

There is limited information about which factors influence the use and intention to use Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) technologies in livestock farming. Effective interventions that address the enablers and barriers to using PLF require a theoretical model to identify these factors. We empirically evaluated the Capability Opportunity Motivation Behavior (COM-B) model using US swine producers as a case study. Specifically, we tested the COM-B model as a framework for planning interventions in two behavioral contexts: PLF usage and the intention to use PLF. Our cross-sectional survey involved 53 swine producers from Iowa, Michigan, and North Carolina. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to specify and test the models. Most participants were male, aged 31–50, with extensive farming experience. Awareness was high for electronic sow feeders (ESF), radio frequency identification (RFID), and weighing scales but lower for other technologies. Over one-third currently use PLF, with many non-users open to future adoption. Capability positively influences PLF usage, while motivation mediates the effect of opportunity, with high costs deterring usage. Effective interventions should address cost concerns and focus on animal welfare to promote efficient, welfare-friendly swine production.

Smart Agricultural TechnologyVol. 10
Iowa State University (US), Scotland's Rural College (GB), Michigan State University (US)
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
14.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.