Fuzzy Decision‐Making Framework for Evaluating Hybrid Detection Models of Trauma Patients

ABSTRACT This study introduces a new multi‐criteria decision‐making (MCDM) framework to evaluate trauma injury detection models in intensive care units (ICUs). This research addresses the challenges associated with diverse machine learning (ML) models, inconsistencies, conflicting priorities, and the importance of metrics. The developed methodology consists of three phases: dataset identification and pre‐processing, hybrid model development, and an evaluation/benchmarking framework. Through meticulous pre‐processing, the dataset is tailored to focus on adult trauma patients. Forty hybrid models were developed by combining eight ML algorithms with four filter‐based feature‐selection methods and principal component analysis (PCA) as a dimensionality reduction method, and these models were evaluated using seven metrics. The weight coefficients for these metrics are determined using the 2‐tuple Linguistic Fermatean Fuzzy‐Weighted Zero‐Inconsistency (2TLF‐FWZIC) method. The Vlsekriterijumska Optimizcija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) approach is applied to rank the developed models. According to 2TLF‐FWZIC, classification accuracy (CA) and precision obtained the highest importance weights of 0.2439 and 0.1805, respectively, while F1, training time, and test time obtained the lowest weights of 0.1055, 0.0886, and 0.1111, respectively. The benchmarking results revealed the following top‐performing models: the Gini index with logistic regression (GI‐LR), the Gini index with a decision tree (GI_DT), and the information gain with a decision tree (IG_DT), with VIKOR Q score values of 0.016435, 0.023804, and 0.042077, respectively. The proposed MCDM framework is assessed and examined using systematic ranking, sensitivity analysis, validation of the best‐selected model using two unseen trauma datasets, and mode explainability using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method. We benchmarked the proposed methodology against three other benchmark studies and achieved a score of 100% across six key areas. The proposed methodology provides several insights into the empirical synthesis of this study. It contributes to advancing medical informatics by enhancing the understanding and selection of trauma injury detection models for ICUs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Systems
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.70005
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fuzzy Decision‐Making Framework for Evaluating Hybrid Detection Models of Trauma Patients

Rula A. Hamid, A. S. Albahri, Z.T. Al-Qaysi, Shahad Sabbar Joudar et al.
3 citations
Expert Systems
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
6.32
article

Fuzzy Decision‐Making Framework for Evaluating Hybrid Detection Models of Trauma Patients

Rula A. Hamid, A. S. Albahri, Z.T. Al-Qaysi, Shahad Sabbar Joudar, Iman Mohamad Sharaf, A. H. Alamoodi, Idrees A. Zahid, Laith Alzubaidi, Yuantong Gu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study introduces a new multi‐criteria decision‐making (MCDM) framework to evaluate trauma injury detection models in intensive care units (ICUs). This research addresses the challenges associated with diverse machine learning (ML) models, inconsistencies, conflicting priorities, and the importance of metrics. The developed methodology consists of three phases: dataset identification and pre‐processing, hybrid model development, and an evaluation/benchmarking framework. Through meticulous pre‐processing, the dataset is tailored to focus on adult trauma patients. Forty hybrid models were developed by combining eight ML algorithms with four filter‐based feature‐selection methods and principal component analysis (PCA) as a dimensionality reduction method, and these models were evaluated using seven metrics. The weight coefficients for these metrics are determined using the 2‐tuple Linguistic Fermatean Fuzzy‐Weighted Zero‐Inconsistency (2TLF‐FWZIC) method. The Vlsekriterijumska Optimizcija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) approach is applied to rank the developed models. According to 2TLF‐FWZIC, classification accuracy (CA) and precision obtained the highest importance weights of 0.2439 and 0.1805, respectively, while F1, training time, and test time obtained the lowest weights of 0.1055, 0.0886, and 0.1111, respectively. The benchmarking results revealed the following top‐performing models: the Gini index with logistic regression (GI‐LR), the Gini index with a decision tree (GI_DT), and the information gain with a decision tree (IG_DT), with VIKOR Q score values of 0.016435, 0.023804, and 0.042077, respectively. The proposed MCDM framework is assessed and examined using systematic ranking, sensitivity analysis, validation of the best‐selected model using two unseen trauma datasets, and mode explainability using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method. We benchmarked the proposed methodology against three other benchmark studies and achieved a score of 100% across six key areas. The proposed methodology provides several insights into the empirical synthesis of this study. It contributes to advancing medical informatics by enhancing the understanding and selection of trauma injury detection models for ICUs.

Expert SystemsVol. 42(3)
Applied Science Private University (JO), Higher Technological Institute (EG), Queensland University of Technology (AU), University of Technology - Iraq (IQ), Gulf University for Science & Technology (KW), University of Information Technology and Communications (IQ), Mazaya University College, University of Tikrit (IQ)
Australian Government
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
6.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.