Optimization of resource management in vulnerable areas within the interconnected framework of ecosystem services supply and demand

• Propose an integrated ecological zoning approach applicable to vulnerable areas. • Proposals to mitigate uneven ecological resource and synergistic management. • Uncovering dynamics of different ecological resource areas over the past 20 years. • Uncovering the dynamics of supply, demand and ecological risk of integrated ESs. Ecological zoning is utilized to identify critical ecological areas that are essential for preserving ecosystem integrity and stability. However, the zoning of fragile areas does not adequately address issues related to uneven distribution of ecological resources and the lack of synergistic management. To overcome this limitation, a comprehensive ecological zoning framework is proposed in this study, integrating the multidimensional Comprehensive Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand Ratio (CESDR) and Ecological Risk Index (ERI) within the Yellow River Basin (YRB), a prototypical ecologically fragile zone in China. Results indicate that: (1) the supply capacity of ecological resources in the YRB has gradually increased between 2000 and 2020, exhibiting a surplus in the south, a deficit in the north, and a spatial mismatch between the supply and demand of water resources; (2) the YRB is predominantly characterized by areas of medium to high ecological risk, which decreased by 83,640 km2 (10.34 %) between 2000 and 2020; (3) the YRB is classified into Ecological Resource Supply Zones (ERSZs), Ecological Resource Development Zones (ERDZs), Ecological Resource Redline Zones (ERRZs), and Ecological Resource Conservation Zones (ERCZs); (4) notably, the ERRZs, which predominate in the YRB, decreased by 20.88 % between 2000 and 2020, primarily transitioning into ERCZs (16.18 % increase) and ERSZs (3.49 % increase). It is proposed that ERSZs and ERCZs leverage ecological resource allocation to mitigate the imbalance between supply and demand within the YRB, enhance the ecological compensation mechanism for ERRZs to facilitate value accounting. This study provides insights into the sustainable development of fragile ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113235
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of resource management in vulnerable areas within the interconnected framework of ecosystem services supply and demand

Zhenglin Tian, Bangshuai Han, Xuegang Mao, Tongpeng Wang et al.
1 citations
Ecological Indicators
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
article

Optimization of resource management in vulnerable areas within the interconnected framework of ecosystem services supply and demand

Zhenglin Tian, Bangshuai Han, Xuegang Mao, Tongpeng Wang, Zhenling Liu, Yuan Liu, Chengyuan Wang, Li Ding, Sergey Chumachenkod, Viktor Karminovd
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Propose an integrated ecological zoning approach applicable to vulnerable areas. • Proposals to mitigate uneven ecological resource and synergistic management. • Uncovering dynamics of different ecological resource areas over the past 20 years. • Uncovering the dynamics of supply, demand and ecological risk of integrated ESs. Ecological zoning is utilized to identify critical ecological areas that are essential for preserving ecosystem integrity and stability. However, the zoning of fragile areas does not adequately address issues related to uneven distribution of ecological resources and the lack of synergistic management. To overcome this limitation, a comprehensive ecological zoning framework is proposed in this study, integrating the multidimensional Comprehensive Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand Ratio (CESDR) and Ecological Risk Index (ERI) within the Yellow River Basin (YRB), a prototypical ecologically fragile zone in China. Results indicate that: (1) the supply capacity of ecological resources in the YRB has gradually increased between 2000 and 2020, exhibiting a surplus in the south, a deficit in the north, and a spatial mismatch between the supply and demand of water resources; (2) the YRB is predominantly characterized by areas of medium to high ecological risk, which decreased by 83,640 km2 (10.34 %) between 2000 and 2020; (3) the YRB is classified into Ecological Resource Supply Zones (ERSZs), Ecological Resource Development Zones (ERDZs), Ecological Resource Redline Zones (ERRZs), and Ecological Resource Conservation Zones (ERCZs); (4) notably, the ERRZs, which predominate in the YRB, decreased by 20.88 % between 2000 and 2020, primarily transitioning into ERCZs (16.18 % increase) and ERSZs (3.49 % increase). It is proposed that ERSZs and ERCZs leverage ecological resource allocation to mitigate the imbalance between supply and demand within the YRB, enhance the ecological compensation mechanism for ERRZs to facilitate value accounting. This study provides insights into the sustainable development of fragile ecosystems.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 171
Bauman Moscow State Technical University (RU), Northeast Forestry University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.