Exploring AI-in-the-making: Sociomaterial genealogies of AI performativity

Recent interest in artificial intelligence technologies has led to much discussion about what the age of AI portends for how we live and work. And specifically for the present discussion, what it means for agency. In offering our contributions to these considerations, we build on approaches to treat AI not as a “thing” but as phenomena in-the-making. Such a framing orients us to doings, to practices, to enactments, and consequential outcomes. These considerations of AI-in-the-making are inspired by agential realism, a theory that calls attention to performativity and accountability. Based on these ideas, we propose a sociomaterial genealogical approach that we suggest is well-suited for the study of AI-in-the-making. In so doing, we provide qualitative scholars with a way of orienting their inquiries toward the performativity of ongoing AI reconfigurations and sociomaterial accountabilities. • Proposes treating AI not as a ‘thing’ but as phenomena in-the-making. • Offers a performative account of agency inspired by agential realism. • Outlines a sociomaterial genealogical approach for studying AI-in-the-making. • Discusses concerns surrounding responsibility and ethics of AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information and Organization
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2025.100558
Citations
20
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
47.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring AI-in-the-making: Sociomaterial genealogies of AI performativity

Wanda J. Orlikowski, Susan Scott
20 citations
Information and Organization
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
47.31
article

Exploring AI-in-the-making: Sociomaterial genealogies of AI performativity

Wanda J. Orlikowski, Susan Scott
article en
20 citations

Abstract

Recent interest in artificial intelligence technologies has led to much discussion about what the age of AI portends for how we live and work. And specifically for the present discussion, what it means for agency. In offering our contributions to these considerations, we build on approaches to treat AI not as a “thing” but as phenomena in-the-making. Such a framing orients us to doings, to practices, to enactments, and consequential outcomes. These considerations of AI-in-the-making are inspired by agential realism, a theory that calls attention to performativity and accountability. Based on these ideas, we propose a sociomaterial genealogical approach that we suggest is well-suited for the study of AI-in-the-making. In so doing, we provide qualitative scholars with a way of orienting their inquiries toward the performativity of ongoing AI reconfigurations and sociomaterial accountabilities. • Proposes treating AI not as a ‘thing’ but as phenomena in-the-making. • Offers a performative account of agency inspired by agential realism. • Outlines a sociomaterial genealogical approach for studying AI-in-the-making. • Discusses concerns surrounding responsibility and ethics of AI.

Information and OrganizationVol. 35(1)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
47.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.