Relationship‐Specific Attachment and Mentalization as Predictors of Borderline Personality Features and Interpersonal Competence Among Emerging Adults

Developmental psychopathology models, like the mentalization theory, have facilitated the theoretical understanding of trajectories that contribute to the expression and experience of borderline personality (BP) features. Mentalization theory posits that BP vulnerabilities and interpersonal difficulties arise from insecure attachment experiences and deficits in mentalizing ability. This study explored the intersections of attachment vulnerabilities in close relationships, mentalizing domains, and their combined impact on BP features and interpersonal competence in emerging adults. The sample included 742 emerging adults (18-25 years) from colleges across 23 Indian states, who completed an online survey measuring relationship-specific attachment anxiety and avoidance (mother, father, best friend), mentalization (self-related, other-related, motivation to mentalize), BP features, and interpersonal competence. Path analysis was conducted to examine (a) the association between relationship-specific attachment dimensions and BP features/interpersonal competence and (b) mentalization as a mediator. Attachment anxiety and avoidance in specific relationships were found to have direct positive effects on BP features and direct negative effects on interpersonal competence. However, the strength and significance of these effects were not similar across relationships, shedding light on unique contributions of relationship-specific attachment difficulties on BP features and interpersonal competence. Mentalization mediated these associations, with self-related mentalization uniquely affecting BP features and other-related mentalization influencing interpersonal competence. The findings underscore the importance of relationship-specific attachment and mentalization domains in BP vulnerabilities among emerging adults. They provide empirical support for developing targeted mentalization-based interventions to enhance self and interpersonal functioning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Mental Health
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.70009
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationship‐Specific Attachment and Mentalization as Predictors of Borderline Personality Features and Interpersonal Competence Among Emerging Adults

Poornima Bhola, K. S. Meena, Mehak Sikand
2 citations
Personality and Mental Health
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
4.61
article

Relationship‐Specific Attachment and Mentalization as Predictors of Borderline Personality Features and Interpersonal Competence Among Emerging Adults

Poornima Bhola, K. S. Meena, Mehak Sikand
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Developmental psychopathology models, like the mentalization theory, have facilitated the theoretical understanding of trajectories that contribute to the expression and experience of borderline personality (BP) features. Mentalization theory posits that BP vulnerabilities and interpersonal difficulties arise from insecure attachment experiences and deficits in mentalizing ability. This study explored the intersections of attachment vulnerabilities in close relationships, mentalizing domains, and their combined impact on BP features and interpersonal competence in emerging adults. The sample included 742 emerging adults (18-25 years) from colleges across 23 Indian states, who completed an online survey measuring relationship-specific attachment anxiety and avoidance (mother, father, best friend), mentalization (self-related, other-related, motivation to mentalize), BP features, and interpersonal competence. Path analysis was conducted to examine (a) the association between relationship-specific attachment dimensions and BP features/interpersonal competence and (b) mentalization as a mediator. Attachment anxiety and avoidance in specific relationships were found to have direct positive effects on BP features and direct negative effects on interpersonal competence. However, the strength and significance of these effects were not similar across relationships, shedding light on unique contributions of relationship-specific attachment difficulties on BP features and interpersonal competence. Mentalization mediated these associations, with self-related mentalization uniquely affecting BP features and other-related mentalization influencing interpersonal competence. The findings underscore the importance of relationship-specific attachment and mentalization domains in BP vulnerabilities among emerging adults. They provide empirical support for developing targeted mentalization-based interventions to enhance self and interpersonal functioning.

Personality and Mental HealthVol. 19(1)
O. P. Jindal Global University (IN), National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (IN)
University Grants Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
4.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.