A Theoretical Analysis of Efficiency Constrained Utility-Privacy Bi-Objective Optimization in Federated Learning

Federated learning (FL) enables multiple clients to collaboratively learn a shared model without sharing their individual data. Concerns about utility, privacy, and training efficiency in FL have garnered significant research attention. Differential privacy has emerged as a prevalent technique in FL, safeguarding the privacy of individual user data while impacting utility and training efficiency. Within Differential Privacy Federated Learning (DPFL), previous studies have primarily focused on the utility-privacy trade-off, neglecting training efficiency, which is crucial for timely completion. Moreover, differential privacy achieves privacy by introducing controlled randomness (noise) on selected clients in each communication round. Previous work has mainly examined the impact of noise level (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\sigma$</tex-math></inline-formula>) and communication rounds (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$T$</tex-math></inline-formula>) on the privacy-utility dynamic, overlooking other influential factors like the sample ratio (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$q$</tex-math></inline-formula>, the proportion of selected clients). This paper systematically formulates an efficiency-constrained utility-privacy bi-objective optimization problem in DPFL, focusing on <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\sigma$</tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$T$</tex-math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$q$</tex-math></inline-formula>. We provide a comprehensive theoretical analysis, yielding analytical solutions for the Pareto front. Extensive empirical experiments verify the validity and efficacy of our analysis, offering valuable guidance for low-cost parameter design in DPFL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Big Data
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tbdata.2025.3534622
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Theoretical Analysis of Efficiency Constrained Utility-Privacy Bi-Objective Optimization in Federated Learning

Hanlin Gu, Xinyuan Zhao, Gongxi Zhu, Yuxing Han et al.
1 citations
IEEE Transactions on Big Data
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
2.48
article

A Theoretical Analysis of Efficiency Constrained Utility-Privacy Bi-Objective Optimization in Federated Learning

Hanlin Gu, Xinyuan Zhao, Gongxi Zhu, Yuxing Han, Yan Kang, Lixin Fan, Qiang Yang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) enables multiple clients to collaboratively learn a shared model without sharing their individual data. Concerns about utility, privacy, and training efficiency in FL have garnered significant research attention. Differential privacy has emerged as a prevalent technique in FL, safeguarding the privacy of individual user data while impacting utility and training efficiency. Within Differential Privacy Federated Learning (DPFL), previous studies have primarily focused on the utility-privacy trade-off, neglecting training efficiency, which is crucial for timely completion. Moreover, differential privacy achieves privacy by introducing controlled randomness (noise) on selected clients in each communication round. Previous work has mainly examined the impact of noise level (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\sigma$</tex-math></inline-formula>) and communication rounds (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$T$</tex-math></inline-formula>) on the privacy-utility dynamic, overlooking other influential factors like the sample ratio (<inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$q$</tex-math></inline-formula>, the proportion of selected clients). This paper systematically formulates an efficiency-constrained utility-privacy bi-objective optimization problem in DPFL, focusing on <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\sigma$</tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$T$</tex-math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$q$</tex-math></inline-formula>. We provide a comprehensive theoretical analysis, yielding analytical solutions for the Pareto front. Extensive empirical experiments verify the validity and efficacy of our analysis, offering valuable guidance for low-cost parameter design in DPFL.

IEEE Transactions on Big DataVol. 11(5)
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK), University Town of Shenzhen (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.