Impact of subcutaneous tunnel length on infection risk in tunneled PICCs: a study in cancer patient

Tunneled peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are crucial for delivering long-term intravenous therapies to cancer patients. We compared PICC-related complications among different patient groups and identify potential factors contributing to these complications. A total of 402 cancer patients who received tunneled PICC placement in our hospital were enrolled in this study. We then compared their general data, PICC-related characteristics, pain score and anxiety score, and PICC-related complications. Extravasation length were varied significantly between groups, with the highest length observed in Group A4. Analysis of catheter type showed a predominance of 4Fr and 4 F catheters. Needle size and catheter material used also differed significantly between groups. High-pressure single-lumen catheters were the most common. In addition, pain and anxiety scores were significantly different between the groups, with the A3 group scoring the highest in both areas. There were significant differences between the groups in PICC-related complications, particularly "Difficulty in Removal", which was significantly higher in the A4 group (7.2%). Attention to differences in gender distribution, BMI, PICC-related characteristics, and pain and anxiety scores in cancer patients in the clinical setting is important in developing an individualized approach to PICC placement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-82430-7
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of subcutaneous tunnel length on infection risk in tunneled PICCs: a study in cancer patient

Yazhi Peng, Siqin Li, Yong Gao, Meng‐Ling Wu et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
5.03
article

Impact of subcutaneous tunnel length on infection risk in tunneled PICCs: a study in cancer patient

Yazhi Peng, Siqin Li, Yong Gao, Meng‐Ling Wu, Tuo Yi, Shanquan Li, Wei Tang, Yanting Ning, Hong Lu, Xiaohua Fan, Hui Guo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Tunneled peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are crucial for delivering long-term intravenous therapies to cancer patients. We compared PICC-related complications among different patient groups and identify potential factors contributing to these complications. A total of 402 cancer patients who received tunneled PICC placement in our hospital were enrolled in this study. We then compared their general data, PICC-related characteristics, pain score and anxiety score, and PICC-related complications. Extravasation length were varied significantly between groups, with the highest length observed in Group A4. Analysis of catheter type showed a predominance of 4Fr and 4 F catheters. Needle size and catheter material used also differed significantly between groups. High-pressure single-lumen catheters were the most common. In addition, pain and anxiety scores were significantly different between the groups, with the A3 group scoring the highest in both areas. There were significant differences between the groups in PICC-related complications, particularly "Difficulty in Removal", which was significantly higher in the A4 group (7.2%). Attention to differences in gender distribution, BMI, PICC-related characteristics, and pain and anxiety scores in cancer patients in the clinical setting is important in developing an individualized approach to PICC placement.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
5.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.