Personalized decision making for coronary artery disease treatment using offline reinforcement learning

Choosing optimal revascularization strategies for patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a clinical challenge. While randomized controlled trials offer population-level insights, gaps remain regarding personalized decision-making for individual patients. We applied off-policy reinforcement learning (RL) to a composite data model from 41,328 unique patients with angiography-confirmed obstructive CAD. In an offline setting, we estimated optimal treatment policies and evaluated these policies using weighted importance sampling. Our findings indicate that RL-guided therapy decisions outperformed physician-based decision making, with RL policies achieving up to 32% improvement in expected rewards based on composite major cardiovascular events outcomes. Additionally, we introduced methods to ensure that RL CAD treatment policies remain compatible with locally achievable clinical practice models, presenting an interpretable RL policy with a limited number of states. Overall, this novel RL-based clinical decision support tool, RL4CAD, demonstrates potential to optimize care in patients with obstructive CAD referred for invasive coronary angiography.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01498-1
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Personalized decision making for coronary artery disease treatment using offline reinforcement learning

Joon S. Lee, Peyman Ghasemi, Danielle A. Southern, James A. White et al.
9 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
18.06
article

Personalized decision making for coronary artery disease treatment using offline reinforcement learning

Joon S. Lee, Peyman Ghasemi, Danielle A. Southern, James A. White, Bin Li, Matthew Greenberg
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Choosing optimal revascularization strategies for patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a clinical challenge. While randomized controlled trials offer population-level insights, gaps remain regarding personalized decision-making for individual patients. We applied off-policy reinforcement learning (RL) to a composite data model from 41,328 unique patients with angiography-confirmed obstructive CAD. In an offline setting, we estimated optimal treatment policies and evaluated these policies using weighted importance sampling. Our findings indicate that RL-guided therapy decisions outperformed physician-based decision making, with RL policies achieving up to 32% improvement in expected rewards based on composite major cardiovascular events outcomes. Additionally, we introduced methods to ensure that RL CAD treatment policies remain compatible with locally achievable clinical practice models, presenting an interpretable RL policy with a limited number of states. Overall, this novel RL-based clinical decision support tool, RL4CAD, demonstrates potential to optimize care in patients with obstructive CAD referred for invasive coronary angiography.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 8(1)
Alberta Health Services (CA), University of Calgary (CA), Foothills Medical Centre (CA), Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta (CA)
Alberta Innovates, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
18.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.