Methodological Diversity and Trends in Intertextual Reading Research

This study aims to reveal the methodological diversity and trends in research on intertextual reading. Using a qualitative descriptive survey, 23 research articles published between 2014 and 2024 were analysed. The research focuses on the methodologies, sample types, data collection tools, prominent findings and recommendations of these articles. The results show that intertextual reading has become a universal area of academic interest by crossing cultural and interdisciplinary boundaries, especially in fields such as education, literature, psychology and linguistics. The study reveals that qualitative methods are predominantly used and that there is a tendency towards in-depth and contextual analyses of intertextual processes. However, quantitative and mixed methods were also used to test the findings in larger sample groups. The research reveals that university students are the primary focus of these studies, but significant attention has also been paid to secondary and primary levels. The findings suggest the global applicability of intertextual reading strategies, the development of critical and creative thinking skills, and students' in-depth understanding of texts from multiple perspectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Education and Future
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.1561558
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodological Diversity and Trends in Intertextual Reading Research

Hayati Akyol, Kübra Babacan
Journal of Education and Future
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Methodological Diversity and Trends in Intertextual Reading Research

Hayati Akyol, Kübra Babacan
article en

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the methodological diversity and trends in research on intertextual reading. Using a qualitative descriptive survey, 23 research articles published between 2014 and 2024 were analysed. The research focuses on the methodologies, sample types, data collection tools, prominent findings and recommendations of these articles. The results show that intertextual reading has become a universal area of academic interest by crossing cultural and interdisciplinary boundaries, especially in fields such as education, literature, psychology and linguistics. The study reveals that qualitative methods are predominantly used and that there is a tendency towards in-depth and contextual analyses of intertextual processes. However, quantitative and mixed methods were also used to test the findings in larger sample groups. The research reveals that university students are the primary focus of these studies, but significant attention has also been paid to secondary and primary levels. The findings suggest the global applicability of intertextual reading strategies, the development of critical and creative thinking skills, and students' in-depth understanding of texts from multiple perspectives.

Journal of Education and Future(27)
Ankara University (TR), Gazi Hastanesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Methodological Diversity and Trends in Intertextual Reading Research — Hayati Akyol, Kübra Babacan · Journal of Education and Future (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS