Beyond Traditional Methods: Evaluating Advanced Machine Learning Models for Superior Fraud Detection

The banking industry is increasingly concerned about credit card fraud due to its potential risks to both consumers and financial institutions. In recent years, machine learning techniques have proven effective in detecting fraudulent transactions. This study compares the performance of two wellknown machine learning methods such as XGBoost and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) in identifying credit card fraud. We assess the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score of these methods using a publicly available credit card transaction dataset. Additionally, the study examines the computational efficiency and scalability of ANNs and XGBoost to determine their suitability for real-time fraud detection systems. ANNs achieve the highest accuracy at 96.9%, surpassing all five methods evaluated, while XGBoost, with an accuracy of 92.7%, outperforms all other classifiers. These results provide valuable insights for financial institutions looking to implement or improve fraud detection systems, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each approach. This research contributes to ongoing efforts to leverage advanced machine learning techniques to combat credit card fraud and enhance financial security.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icuis64676.2024.10866102
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Traditional Methods: Evaluating Advanced Machine Learning Models for Superior Fraud Detection

Kanwarpartap Singh Gill, Ajay Singh, Mukesh Kumar, Ruchira Rawat
9 citations
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
3.13
article

Beyond Traditional Methods: Evaluating Advanced Machine Learning Models for Superior Fraud Detection

Kanwarpartap Singh Gill, Ajay Singh, Mukesh Kumar, Ruchira Rawat
article en
9 citations

Abstract

The banking industry is increasingly concerned about credit card fraud due to its potential risks to both consumers and financial institutions. In recent years, machine learning techniques have proven effective in detecting fraudulent transactions. This study compares the performance of two wellknown machine learning methods such as XGBoost and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) in identifying credit card fraud. We assess the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score of these methods using a publicly available credit card transaction dataset. Additionally, the study examines the computational efficiency and scalability of ANNs and XGBoost to determine their suitability for real-time fraud detection systems. ANNs achieve the highest accuracy at 96.9%, surpassing all five methods evaluated, while XGBoost, with an accuracy of 92.7%, outperforms all other classifiers. These results provide valuable insights for financial institutions looking to implement or improve fraud detection systems, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each approach. This research contributes to ongoing efforts to leverage advanced machine learning techniques to combat credit card fraud and enhance financial security.

Graphic Era University (IN), Chitkara University (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.