Destroying Densest Subgraphs is Hard

We analyze the computational complexity of the following computational problems called Bounded-Density Edge Deletion and Bounded-Density Vertex Deletion : Given a graph G , a budget k and a target density τ ρ , are there k edges ( k vertices) whose removal from G results in a graph where the densest subgraph has density at most τ ρ ? Here, the density of a graph is the number of its edges divided by the number of its vertices. We prove that both problems are polynomial-time solvable on trees and cliques but are NP-complete on planar bipartite graphs and split graphs. From a parameterized point of view, we show that both problems are fixed-parameter tractable with respect to the vertex cover number but W[1]-hard with respect to the solution size. Furthermore, we prove that Bounded-Density Edge Deletion is W[1]-hard with respect to the feedback edge number, demonstrating that the problem remains hard on very sparse graphs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer and System Sciences
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2025.103635
Primary Topic
Graph Theory and Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Destroying Densest Subgraphs is Hard

Cristina Bazgan, André Nichterlein, Sofia Vazquez Alferez
Journal of Computer and System Sciences
Graph Theory and Algorithms
article

Destroying Densest Subgraphs is Hard

Cristina Bazgan, André Nichterlein, Sofia Vazquez Alferez
article en

Abstract

We analyze the computational complexity of the following computational problems called Bounded-Density Edge Deletion and Bounded-Density Vertex Deletion : Given a graph G , a budget k and a target density τ ρ , are there k edges ( k vertices) whose removal from G results in a graph where the densest subgraph has density at most τ ρ ? Here, the density of a graph is the number of its edges divided by the number of its vertices. We prove that both problems are polynomial-time solvable on trees and cliques but are NP-complete on planar bipartite graphs and split graphs. From a parameterized point of view, we show that both problems are fixed-parameter tractable with respect to the vertex cover number but W[1]-hard with respect to the solution size. Furthermore, we prove that Bounded-Density Edge Deletion is W[1]-hard with respect to the feedback edge number, demonstrating that the problem remains hard on very sparse graphs.

Journal of Computer and System Sciences
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Technische Universität Berlin (DE), Université Paris Dauphine-PSL (FR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Graph Theory and Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Destroying Densest Subgraphs is Hard — Cristina Bazgan, André Nichterlein, et al. · Journal of Computer and System Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS