A comparative study of parameter identification methods for equivalent circuit models for lithium-ion batteries and their application to state of health estimation

Accurate estimation of the battery state is a crucial requirement for advanced battery management systems (BMS). Model-based state estimation methods represent the most promising option to meet BMS requirements, where the equivalent circuit model (ECM) is an effective balance between modelling complexity and accuracy. ECM's accuracy is influenced by the combination of chosen model type and parameter identification method. In this paper, batteries are aged under various conditions. Both frequency and time domain measurements are performed on batteries in a variety of aging states. These measurements are employed for comparing all combinations of 7 existing models with 7 common identification methods. In addition, the accuracy of SOH models based on ECM parameters is investigated. The experimental results indicate that for frequency and time domain measurements, the same identification algorithm may exhibit distinct performances. Overall, PSO, GWO and LSQ are ideal candidates. Among them, PSO and GWO perform optimally in the frequency domain environment, while LSQ is superior in the time domain environment. Furthermore, this conclusion does not change with battery aging. Meanwhile, a simpler model structure is even beneficial for efficiently monitoring SOH when utilizing the aforementioned superior identification methods. • Provides insights into multiple combinations of models and identification methods. • Determination of ideal identification methods with numerous battery lifespan tests. • Evaluate methods' performance in both the frequency and time domains. • ECM parameters' performance for SOH estimation are analyzed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Energy Storage
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2025.115707
Citations
25
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.07

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of parameter identification methods for equivalent circuit models for lithium-ion batteries and their application to state of health estimation

J. Kainz, Yixin Liu, Jinghua Sun
25 citations
Journal of Energy Storage
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
17.07
article

A comparative study of parameter identification methods for equivalent circuit models for lithium-ion batteries and their application to state of health estimation

J. Kainz, Yixin Liu, Jinghua Sun
article en
25 citations

Abstract

Accurate estimation of the battery state is a crucial requirement for advanced battery management systems (BMS). Model-based state estimation methods represent the most promising option to meet BMS requirements, where the equivalent circuit model (ECM) is an effective balance between modelling complexity and accuracy. ECM's accuracy is influenced by the combination of chosen model type and parameter identification method. In this paper, batteries are aged under various conditions. Both frequency and time domain measurements are performed on batteries in a variety of aging states. These measurements are employed for comparing all combinations of 7 existing models with 7 common identification methods. In addition, the accuracy of SOH models based on ECM parameters is investigated. The experimental results indicate that for frequency and time domain measurements, the same identification algorithm may exhibit distinct performances. Overall, PSO, GWO and LSQ are ideal candidates. Among them, PSO and GWO perform optimally in the frequency domain environment, while LSQ is superior in the time domain environment. Furthermore, this conclusion does not change with battery aging. Meanwhile, a simpler model structure is even beneficial for efficiently monitoring SOH when utilizing the aforementioned superior identification methods. • Provides insights into multiple combinations of models and identification methods. • Determination of ideal identification methods with numerous battery lifespan tests. • Evaluate methods' performance in both the frequency and time domains. • ECM parameters' performance for SOH estimation are analyzed.

Journal of Energy StorageVol. 114
Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
17.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.