Reading subtyping of Arabic-speaking university students: a contribution to the accuracy vs. rate model of dyslexia

The current study sought to examine the existence of reading subtypes based on specific accuracy and rate criteria in dyslexia among a non-clinical sample of 120 Arabic-speaking University students and to characterize their reading-related and linguistic skills. For this aim, we relied on a conventional practice in reading disability literature based on a 25th percentile low achievement cut-offs. All students were examined using a battery of reading, linguistic, and cognitive tasks. The analysis conducted here provided partial support for the validity of the subtyping approach based on the accuracy and rate achievements and showed that ~ 12.5% of the sample could be defined as low accuracy (LA), ~ 10.8% as low rate (LR), and ~ 10.8% as a combined doubly low subtype (DL). The results showed that the combined DL group exhibited the lowest scores in all reading-related and linguistic tasks. Also, specific response patterns were found for LA and LR subtypes in reading-related pseudowords' decoding and phonological awareness measures. These findings, the first to provide insights into the question of adult dyslexia through analysis of reading subtypes among Arabic-speaking students, are discussed in relation to previous findings in the literature among speakers of other languages. The data presented here provide new support for the adequacy of the accuracy vs. rate model of dyslexia among adults and stress the need for developing different interventions for the different reading subtypes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Dyslexia
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-025-00323-4
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.89

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reading subtyping of Arabic-speaking university students: a contribution to the accuracy vs. rate model of dyslexia

Asaid Khateb, Bahaa Madi Tarabya, Samer Andria
2 citations
Annals of Dyslexia
Reading and Literacy Development
6.89
article

Reading subtyping of Arabic-speaking university students: a contribution to the accuracy vs. rate model of dyslexia

Asaid Khateb, Bahaa Madi Tarabya, Samer Andria
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The current study sought to examine the existence of reading subtypes based on specific accuracy and rate criteria in dyslexia among a non-clinical sample of 120 Arabic-speaking University students and to characterize their reading-related and linguistic skills. For this aim, we relied on a conventional practice in reading disability literature based on a 25th percentile low achievement cut-offs. All students were examined using a battery of reading, linguistic, and cognitive tasks. The analysis conducted here provided partial support for the validity of the subtyping approach based on the accuracy and rate achievements and showed that ~ 12.5% of the sample could be defined as low accuracy (LA), ~ 10.8% as low rate (LR), and ~ 10.8% as a combined doubly low subtype (DL). The results showed that the combined DL group exhibited the lowest scores in all reading-related and linguistic tasks. Also, specific response patterns were found for LA and LR subtypes in reading-related pseudowords' decoding and phonological awareness measures. These findings, the first to provide insights into the question of adult dyslexia through analysis of reading subtypes among Arabic-speaking students, are discussed in relation to previous findings in the literature among speakers of other languages. The data presented here provide new support for the adequacy of the accuracy vs. rate model of dyslexia among adults and stress the need for developing different interventions for the different reading subtypes.

Annals of DyslexiaVol. 75(2)
University of Haifa (IL)
Israel Science Foundation, University of Haifa
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Reading and Literacy Development
6.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reading subtyping of Arabic-speaking university students: a contribution to the accuracy vs. rate model of dyslexia — Asaid Khateb, Bahaa Madi Tarabya, et al. · Annals of Dyslexia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS