Exacerbating risk in human-ignited large fires over western United States due to lower flammability thresholds and greenhouse gas emissions.

Large fires in the western United States become highly probable when dry conditions surpass critical thresholds of vapor pressure deficit (VPD<sub>t</sub>). VPD<sub>t</sub> likely differs between human- and lightning-ignited fires, potentially leading to ignition-type varied responses of fire weather risk to natural variability and various anthropogenic forcings, yet a comprehensive quantification remains lacking. Here, through fire observations with ignition types and a machine learning method, we found that human-ignited large fires had consistently lower thresholds (VPD<sub>t</sub>) across western US ecoregions. Consequently, the annual number of flammable days (when VPD > VPD<sub>t</sub>) for human-caused large fires was 93% higher on average and increased 21% more rapidly than those caused by lightning during 1979-2020. Through robust statistical detection and attribution of Earth System Models, we found that the anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions predominantly (81%) controlled the human-related flammable day increases, which was 18% greater than the effect of GHGs on the increases in lightning-related flammable days. Such ignition-type varied fire weather risk indicates more large fire-prone conditions for human-regulated fire regimes when GHG emissions are enhancing and ignitions are not limited by fuels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf012
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exacerbating risk in human-ignited large fires over western United States due to lower flammability thresholds and greenhouse gas emissions.

Huanping Huang, Kunxiaojia Yuan, Fa Li, Volker C. Radeloff et al.
PubMed
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Exacerbating risk in human-ignited large fires over western United States due to lower flammability thresholds and greenhouse gas emissions.

Huanping Huang, Kunxiaojia Yuan, Fa Li, Volker C. Radeloff, Qing Zhu, Min Chen
article en

Abstract

Large fires in the western United States become highly probable when dry conditions surpass critical thresholds of vapor pressure deficit (VPD<sub>t</sub>). VPD<sub>t</sub> likely differs between human- and lightning-ignited fires, potentially leading to ignition-type varied responses of fire weather risk to natural variability and various anthropogenic forcings, yet a comprehensive quantification remains lacking. Here, through fire observations with ignition types and a machine learning method, we found that human-ignited large fires had consistently lower thresholds (VPD<sub>t</sub>) across western US ecoregions. Consequently, the annual number of flammable days (when VPD > VPD<sub>t</sub>) for human-caused large fires was 93% higher on average and increased 21% more rapidly than those caused by lightning during 1979-2020. Through robust statistical detection and attribution of Earth System Models, we found that the anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions predominantly (81%) controlled the human-related flammable day increases, which was 18% greater than the effect of GHGs on the increases in lightning-related flammable days. Such ignition-type varied fire weather risk indicates more large fire-prone conditions for human-regulated fire regimes when GHG emissions are enhancing and ignitions are not limited by fuels.

PubMedVol. 4(2)
Louisiana State University (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Office of Science, Division of Graduate Education, Biological and Environmental Research, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.