Reproductive Efficiency of Low-Fertility Dairy Cows Submitted to Presynch-Ovsynch or Double-Ovsynch Scheme for First Service

Reproductive efficiency has a major impact on the profitability of dairy operations. Focusing on improving the reproductive performance of cows with expected reduced fertility is desired; however, further research is needed in this area. The objectives of this study were to identify a subpopulation of cows with suboptimal fertility and evaluate whether hormonal interventions would improve the reproductive efficiency of low-fertility cows. Cows in one herd were enrolled in the study at 50 days in milk (DIM) and classified as low or high fertility according to a proprietary Fertility Index. Weekly cohorts of cows were allocated to three treatments at 50 DIM: (1) high fertility and Presynch-Ovsynch (H-PO; n = 1036); (2) low fertility and Presynch-Ovsynch (L-PO; n = 665); (3) low fertility and Double-Ovsynch (L-DO; n = 645). The voluntary waiting period (VWP) was 65 and 50 DIM for first-lactation and second- and greater-lactation cows, respectively, regardless of the treatment group. For H-PO and L-PO treatments, Presynch-Ovsynch was initiated at 75 ± 3 DIM, and when cows were not inseminated early after detected estrus, timed artificial insemination (TAI) occurred at 113 ± 3 DIM. For cows assigned to the L-DO treatment, Double-Ovsynch was initiated at 53 ± 3 DIM, and when cows were not inseminated early after detected estrus, TAI occurred at 80 ± 3 DIM. All cows were eligible to be inseminated after the end of the VWP and during the entire presynchronization schemes. The Fertility Index successfully identified differences in pregnancy and culling outcomes regardless of the lactation number. Fewer cows (<i>p</i> < 0.01) predicted to have high compared with low fertility required a TAI for the first service, more (<i>p</i> < 0.01) were pregnant by 100 DIM, more (<i>p</i> < 0.01) were alive and pregnant by 250 DIM, fewer (<i>p</i> < 0.01) were culled by 250 DIM, and fewer tended (<i>p</i> = 0.08) to have pregnancy loss after first AI. Applying a fertility scheme (DO) to low-fertility cows failed to increase the proportion of cows pregnant by 250 DIM compared with low-fertility cows exposed to PO when cows were allowed to be inseminated at estrus during the entire presynchronization scheme. We conclude that submitting low-fertility cows to DO optimized the service rate for the first service; however, it did not increase pregnancy per AI compared with L-PO. Lastly, the Fertility Index successfully predicted differences in practical reproductive outcomes routinely monitored in dairy farms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15040536
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reproductive Efficiency of Low-Fertility Dairy Cows Submitted to Presynch-Ovsynch or Double-Ovsynch Scheme for First Service

T.R. Bilby, Jeffrey S. Stevenson, L. B. R. de Mendonça, Kenneth Wronka et al.
2 citations
Animals
Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
3.81
article

Reproductive Efficiency of Low-Fertility Dairy Cows Submitted to Presynch-Ovsynch or Double-Ovsynch Scheme for First Service

T.R. Bilby, Jeffrey S. Stevenson, L. B. R. de Mendonça, Kenneth Wronka, Guy Fridkovski
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Reproductive efficiency has a major impact on the profitability of dairy operations. Focusing on improving the reproductive performance of cows with expected reduced fertility is desired; however, further research is needed in this area. The objectives of this study were to identify a subpopulation of cows with suboptimal fertility and evaluate whether hormonal interventions would improve the reproductive efficiency of low-fertility cows. Cows in one herd were enrolled in the study at 50 days in milk (DIM) and classified as low or high fertility according to a proprietary Fertility Index. Weekly cohorts of cows were allocated to three treatments at 50 DIM: (1) high fertility and Presynch-Ovsynch (H-PO; n = 1036); (2) low fertility and Presynch-Ovsynch (L-PO; n = 665); (3) low fertility and Double-Ovsynch (L-DO; n = 645). The voluntary waiting period (VWP) was 65 and 50 DIM for first-lactation and second- and greater-lactation cows, respectively, regardless of the treatment group. For H-PO and L-PO treatments, Presynch-Ovsynch was initiated at 75 ± 3 DIM, and when cows were not inseminated early after detected estrus, timed artificial insemination (TAI) occurred at 113 ± 3 DIM. For cows assigned to the L-DO treatment, Double-Ovsynch was initiated at 53 ± 3 DIM, and when cows were not inseminated early after detected estrus, TAI occurred at 80 ± 3 DIM. All cows were eligible to be inseminated after the end of the VWP and during the entire presynchronization schemes. The Fertility Index successfully identified differences in pregnancy and culling outcomes regardless of the lactation number. Fewer cows (<i>p</i> < 0.01) predicted to have high compared with low fertility required a TAI for the first service, more (<i>p</i> < 0.01) were pregnant by 100 DIM, more (<i>p</i> < 0.01) were alive and pregnant by 250 DIM, fewer (<i>p</i> < 0.01) were culled by 250 DIM, and fewer tended (<i>p</i> = 0.08) to have pregnancy loss after first AI. Applying a fertility scheme (DO) to low-fertility cows failed to increase the proportion of cows pregnant by 250 DIM compared with low-fertility cows exposed to PO when cows were allowed to be inseminated at estrus during the entire presynchronization scheme. We conclude that submitting low-fertility cows to DO optimized the service rate for the first service; however, it did not increase pregnancy per AI compared with L-PO. Lastly, the Fertility Index successfully predicted differences in practical reproductive outcomes routinely monitored in dairy farms.

AnimalsVol. 15(4)
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US), Kansas State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
3.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.