Advancing a geopolitical Europe: the new EU leadership and the Iranian conundrum

Abstract Since 2019 European leaders have emphasized the necessity for the EU to proactively project power and embrace its geopolitical responsibilities. Although leaders have developed the concept of a ‘geopolitical EU’ as a new discourse, it remains largely unimplemented. Following the June 2024 elections to the European Parliament, a new EU leadership has taken shape amid escalating geopolitical risks that go beyond Russia's war in Ukraine. This development underscores the urgency of advancing a more robust geopolitical EU. The growing strategic power of Iran, which defines itself as a determined revisionist actor, is perceived as a critical challenge to Europe. This policy paper argues that the EU's current Iran policy is misaligned with its geopolitical ambitions, depicting Iran–EU relations as a geopolitical contestation between a defender and a challenger of the existing international order. In this context, the perspective of a geopolitical EU would create a foundation for the new EU leadership to formulate its foreign policy towards Iran. The EU should enhance institutional and policy coordination to elevate Iran's significance on its geopolitical agenda, and the bloc's new leadership needs to develop a cohesive geopolitical mindset within the EU's decision-making framework. The President of the European Commission should lead efforts to foster a unified approach, while the High Representative should build consensus among member states, aligning with the established geopolitical mindset to engage with Iran. Eventually, the new EU leadership needs to define clear geopolitical objectives and establish effective enforcement mechanisms through its diplomatic, political and economic assets.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Affairs
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiae284
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing a geopolitical Europe: the new EU leadership and the Iranian conundrum

Christian Kaunert, Amin Naeni
1 citations
International Affairs
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
2.23
article

Advancing a geopolitical Europe: the new EU leadership and the Iranian conundrum

Christian Kaunert, Amin Naeni
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Since 2019 European leaders have emphasized the necessity for the EU to proactively project power and embrace its geopolitical responsibilities. Although leaders have developed the concept of a ‘geopolitical EU’ as a new discourse, it remains largely unimplemented. Following the June 2024 elections to the European Parliament, a new EU leadership has taken shape amid escalating geopolitical risks that go beyond Russia's war in Ukraine. This development underscores the urgency of advancing a more robust geopolitical EU. The growing strategic power of Iran, which defines itself as a determined revisionist actor, is perceived as a critical challenge to Europe. This policy paper argues that the EU's current Iran policy is misaligned with its geopolitical ambitions, depicting Iran–EU relations as a geopolitical contestation between a defender and a challenger of the existing international order. In this context, the perspective of a geopolitical EU would create a foundation for the new EU leadership to formulate its foreign policy towards Iran. The EU should enhance institutional and policy coordination to elevate Iran's significance on its geopolitical agenda, and the bloc's new leadership needs to develop a cohesive geopolitical mindset within the EU's decision-making framework. The President of the European Commission should lead efforts to foster a unified approach, while the High Representative should build consensus among member states, aligning with the established geopolitical mindset to engage with Iran. Eventually, the new EU leadership needs to define clear geopolitical objectives and establish effective enforcement mechanisms through its diplomatic, political and economic assets.

International AffairsVol. 101(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.