A Comparative Analysis of Different Algorithms for Estimating Evapotranspiration with Limited Observation Variables: A Case Study in Beijing, China

Evapotranspiration (ET) plays a crucial role in the surface water cycle and energy balance, and accurate ET estimation is essential for study in various domains, including agricultural irrigation, drought monitoring, and water resource management. Remote sensing (RS) technology presents an efficient approach for estimating ET at regional scales; however, existing RS retrieval algorithms for ET are intricate and necessitate a multitude of parameters. The land surface temperature–vegetation index (LST-VI) space method and statistical regression by machine learning (ML) offer the benefits of simplicity and straightforward implementation. This study endeavors to identify the optimal long-term sequence LST-VI space method and ML for ET estimation under conditions of limited observed variables, (LST, VI, and near-surface air temperature). A comparative analysis of their performance is undertaken using ground-based flux observations and MOD16 ET data. The findings can be summarized as follows: (1) Long-term remote sensing data can furnish a more comprehensive background field for the LST-VI space, achieving superior fitting accuracy for wet and dry edges, thereby enabling precise ET estimation with the following metrics: correlation coefficient (r) = 0.68, root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.76 mm/d, mean absolute error (MAE) = 0.49 mm/d, and mean bias error (MBE) = −0.14 mm. (2) ML generally produces more accurate ET estimates, with the Random Forest Regressor (RFR) demonstrating the highest accuracy: r = 0.79, RMSE = 0.61 mm/d, MAE = 0.42 mm/d, and MBE = −0.02 mm. (3) Both ET estimates derived from the LST-VI space and ML exhibit spatial distribution characteristics comparable to those of MOD16 ET data, further attesting to the efficacy of these two algorithms. Nevertheless, when compared to MOD16 data, both approaches exhibit varying degrees of underestimation. The results of this study can contribute to water resource management and offer a fresh perspective on remote sensing estimation methods for ET.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17040636
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Different Algorithms for Estimating Evapotranspiration with Limited Observation Variables: A Case Study in Beijing, China

Yanbing Qi, Yuping Lv, Minghan Cheng, Hang Zhang et al.
4 citations
Remote Sensing
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
4.42
article

A Comparative Analysis of Different Algorithms for Estimating Evapotranspiration with Limited Observation Variables: A Case Study in Beijing, China

Yanbing Qi, Yuping Lv, Minghan Cheng, Hang Zhang, Xuemin Li, Yanmin Ren, Di Sun, Zhengxian Zhang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Evapotranspiration (ET) plays a crucial role in the surface water cycle and energy balance, and accurate ET estimation is essential for study in various domains, including agricultural irrigation, drought monitoring, and water resource management. Remote sensing (RS) technology presents an efficient approach for estimating ET at regional scales; however, existing RS retrieval algorithms for ET are intricate and necessitate a multitude of parameters. The land surface temperature–vegetation index (LST-VI) space method and statistical regression by machine learning (ML) offer the benefits of simplicity and straightforward implementation. This study endeavors to identify the optimal long-term sequence LST-VI space method and ML for ET estimation under conditions of limited observed variables, (LST, VI, and near-surface air temperature). A comparative analysis of their performance is undertaken using ground-based flux observations and MOD16 ET data. The findings can be summarized as follows: (1) Long-term remote sensing data can furnish a more comprehensive background field for the LST-VI space, achieving superior fitting accuracy for wet and dry edges, thereby enabling precise ET estimation with the following metrics: correlation coefficient (r) = 0.68, root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.76 mm/d, mean absolute error (MAE) = 0.49 mm/d, and mean bias error (MBE) = −0.14 mm. (2) ML generally produces more accurate ET estimates, with the Random Forest Regressor (RFR) demonstrating the highest accuracy: r = 0.79, RMSE = 0.61 mm/d, MAE = 0.42 mm/d, and MBE = −0.02 mm. (3) Both ET estimates derived from the LST-VI space and ML exhibit spatial distribution characteristics comparable to those of MOD16 ET data, further attesting to the efficacy of these two algorithms. Nevertheless, when compared to MOD16 data, both approaches exhibit varying degrees of underestimation. The results of this study can contribute to water resource management and offer a fresh perspective on remote sensing estimation methods for ET.

Remote SensingVol. 17(4)
Nanjing Forestry University (CN), Sichuan University (CN), Beijing Institute of Water (CN), Beijing Water Science and Technology Institute (CN), National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture (CN), State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Yangzhou University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.