Partitioning and removal of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in full-scale surface flow treatment wetlands with different upstream wastewater treatment

The performance of treatment wetlands (TWs), as a nature-based solution, in mitigating persistent per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and their interactions with existing treatment flowsheets remain unclear. This study investigated PFAS removal in two full-scale surface flow TWs treating secondary effluent from different domestic wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). The systems demonstrated their capacities to safeguard natural water bodies by achieving discharge levels of the legacy PFOS (4–4.6 ng L −1 ) and PFOA (1.79–3.27 ng L −1 ) with removal efficiencies of 29%–38% and 15%–34%, respectively. Further upstream and downstream water quality monitoring in receiving waters is required to accurately evaluate PFAS contributions from WWTP effluents. Partitioning behaviour analysis revealed that sediment adsorption was the dominant removal pathway, achieving removal rates 16–61 times higher than plant uptake for PFOS and 1.8–6 times higher for PFOA. Sediment iron content, depth, and bulk density were positively correlated with PFAS sequestration, highlighting their importance in controlling PFAS mobility. PFOS accumulation in the sediment was greater in the TW for the WWTP dosing with ferric sulphate than the WWTP without chemical dosing (2.80 mg m −2 y −1 vs. 1.34 mg m −2 y −1 ). Notably, a conventional mass balance analysis was challenged by the transformation of PFAS precursors into terminal compounds, including PFOS and PFOA, potentially inflating input concentrations and contributing to mass imbalance during treatment. Further research is necessary to address these complexities, but the findings are encouraging for the use of TWs as scalable, eco-friendly solutions for mitigating PFAS pollution and are instructive for optimising wetland design and operation to safeguard aquatic ecosystems. • Two tertiary surface-flow treatment wetlands (TWs) were assessed for PFAS removal. • TWs continuously discharged legacy PFOS and PFOA at regulatory-acceptable levels. • Ferric dosing in upstream WWTP was linked to higher PFOS adsorption in TW. • Sediment iron content, depth, and bulk density correlated positively with PFAS retention. • PFOS and PFOA were more concentrated in plant roots than above-ground tissues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Water Process Engineering
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.107236
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Partitioning and removal of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in full-scale surface flow treatment wetlands with different upstream wastewater treatment

Alessandra Cincinelli, Chiara Sarti, Tao Lyu, Ayisha Affo Souleymane et al.
9 citations
Journal of Water Process Engineering
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
7.74
article

Partitioning and removal of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in full-scale surface flow treatment wetlands with different upstream wastewater treatment

Alessandra Cincinelli, Chiara Sarti, Tao Lyu, Ayisha Affo Souleymane, Gabriela Dotro
article en
9 citations

Abstract

The performance of treatment wetlands (TWs), as a nature-based solution, in mitigating persistent per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and their interactions with existing treatment flowsheets remain unclear. This study investigated PFAS removal in two full-scale surface flow TWs treating secondary effluent from different domestic wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). The systems demonstrated their capacities to safeguard natural water bodies by achieving discharge levels of the legacy PFOS (4–4.6 ng L −1 ) and PFOA (1.79–3.27 ng L −1 ) with removal efficiencies of 29%–38% and 15%–34%, respectively. Further upstream and downstream water quality monitoring in receiving waters is required to accurately evaluate PFAS contributions from WWTP effluents. Partitioning behaviour analysis revealed that sediment adsorption was the dominant removal pathway, achieving removal rates 16–61 times higher than plant uptake for PFOS and 1.8–6 times higher for PFOA. Sediment iron content, depth, and bulk density were positively correlated with PFAS sequestration, highlighting their importance in controlling PFAS mobility. PFOS accumulation in the sediment was greater in the TW for the WWTP dosing with ferric sulphate than the WWTP without chemical dosing (2.80 mg m −2 y −1 vs. 1.34 mg m −2 y −1 ). Notably, a conventional mass balance analysis was challenged by the transformation of PFAS precursors into terminal compounds, including PFOS and PFOA, potentially inflating input concentrations and contributing to mass imbalance during treatment. Further research is necessary to address these complexities, but the findings are encouraging for the use of TWs as scalable, eco-friendly solutions for mitigating PFAS pollution and are instructive for optimising wetland design and operation to safeguard aquatic ecosystems. • Two tertiary surface-flow treatment wetlands (TWs) were assessed for PFAS removal. • TWs continuously discharged legacy PFOS and PFOA at regulatory-acceptable levels. • Ferric dosing in upstream WWTP was linked to higher PFOS adsorption in TW. • Sediment iron content, depth, and bulk density correlated positively with PFAS retention. • PFOS and PFOA were more concentrated in plant roots than above-ground tissues.

Journal of Water Process EngineeringVol. 71
University of Florence (IT), Cranfield University (GB)
Anglian Water Services Limited, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
7.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.