Language Cues and Perceptions of Nationalism

Abstract How do people respond to symbols related to nationalism, and does having political context matter? We argue that nationalist symbols influence perceptions when in a political context. Leveraging that the Serbian language can be rendered in Cyrillic and Latin, and Cyrillic is associated with nationalism, we examine the use of linguistic symbols in Serbia. Using social media data, we demonstrate that politicians employ Cyrillic to discuss topics traditionally associated with nationalism. Then, based on a pre-registered survey experiment, we show that exposure to Cyrillic absent political context does not alter nationalist attitudes but that respondents exposed to a politician’s message in Cyrillic viewed that politician as more nationalist. Our findings speak to the power of nationalist symbols, demonstrating that said symbols are powerful even when associated with subtle, language-based manipulations. Moreover, they have broad implications for how politicians signal their political beliefs, including how they work to associate themselves with everyday symbols.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Behavior
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-025-10008-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multilingual Education and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Language Cues and Perceptions of Nationalism

William O’Brochta, Patrick Cunha Silva
1 citations
Political Behavior
Multilingual Education and Policy
6.13
article

Language Cues and Perceptions of Nationalism

William O’Brochta, Patrick Cunha Silva
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract How do people respond to symbols related to nationalism, and does having political context matter? We argue that nationalist symbols influence perceptions when in a political context. Leveraging that the Serbian language can be rendered in Cyrillic and Latin, and Cyrillic is associated with nationalism, we examine the use of linguistic symbols in Serbia. Using social media data, we demonstrate that politicians employ Cyrillic to discuss topics traditionally associated with nationalism. Then, based on a pre-registered survey experiment, we show that exposure to Cyrillic absent political context does not alter nationalist attitudes but that respondents exposed to a politician’s message in Cyrillic viewed that politician as more nationalist. Our findings speak to the power of nationalist symbols, demonstrating that said symbols are powerful even when associated with subtle, language-based manipulations. Moreover, they have broad implications for how politicians signal their political beliefs, including how they work to associate themselves with everyday symbols.

Political BehaviorVol. 47(4)
Loyola University Chicago (US), Texas Lutheran University (US)
Washington University in St. Louis
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Multilingual Education and Policy
6.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Language Cues and Perceptions of Nationalism — William O’Brochta, Patrick Cunha Silva · Political Behavior (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS