Minimal Residual Disease–Based End Point for Accelerated Assessment of Clinical Trials in Multiple Myeloma: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data From Multiple Randomized Trials

Our findings provided the support for use of MRD-CR classified at a 10<sup>-5</sup> threshold at either 9 or 12 months after starting of the treatment, as an intermediate end point to support accelerated approvals, in future trials in NDTE patients, NDTinE patients, and patients with RRMM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-24-02020
Citations
29
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
51.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Minimal Residual Disease–Based End Point for Accelerated Assessment of Clinical Trials in Multiple Myeloma: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data From Multiple Randomized Trials

Pieter Sonneveld, Mattia D’Agostino, Dirk Hose, Anja Seckinger et al.
29 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
51.33
article

Minimal Residual Disease–Based End Point for Accelerated Assessment of Clinical Trials in Multiple Myeloma: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data From Multiple Randomized Trials

Pieter Sonneveld, Mattia D’Agostino, Dirk Hose, Anja Seckinger, Jesús F. San Miguel, Stefania Oliva, Brian G.M. Durie, Shaji Kunnathu Kumar, Natalie Dimier, Kenneth Carl Anderson, Nikhil C. Munshi, Qian Shi, Levi Pederson, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Bruno Paiva, Roger G. Owen, Philip L. McCarthy, Thomas J. Prior, Reshma Patel, Jesse G. Dixon, Jordan Mark Schecter, Alberto Órfão, Philippe Moreau, Blake Bartlett, Ela Talpes
article en
29 citations

Abstract

Our findings provided the support for use of MRD-CR classified at a 10<sup>-5</sup> threshold at either 9 or 12 months after starting of the treatment, as an intermediate end point to support accelerated approvals, in future trials in NDTE patients, NDTinE patients, and patients with RRMM.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(11)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Amgen (United States) (US), Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), Harvard University (US), Universidad de Salamanca (ES), Heidelberg University (DE), St James's University Hospital (GB), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT), Roche (United Kingdom) (GB), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Clinica Universidad de Navarra (ES), Johnson & Johnson (United Kingdom) (GB), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL), University of Turin (IT), Universidad de Navarra (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
51.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.