Introducing Iterative Model Calibration (IMC) v1.0: a generalizable framework for numerical model calibration with a CAESAR-Lisflood case study

Abstract. In geosciences, including hydrology and geomorphology, the reliance on numerical models necessitates the precise calibration of their parameters to effectively translate information from observed to unobserved settings. Traditional calibration techniques, however, are marked by poor generalizability, demanding significant manual labor for data preparation and the calibration process itself. Moreover, the utility of machine-learning-based and data-driven approaches is curtailed by the requirement for the numerical model to be differentiable for optimization purposes, which challenges their generalizability across different models. Furthermore, the potential of freely available geomorphological data remains underexploited in existing methodologies. In response to these challenges, we introduce a generalizable framework for calibrating numerical models, with a particular focus on geomorphological models, named Iterative Model Calibration (IMC). This approach efficiently identifies the optimal set of parameters for a given numerical model through a strategy based on a Gaussian neighborhood algorithm. Through experiments, we demonstrate the efficacy of IMC in calibrating the widely used landscape evolution model CAESAR-Lisflood (CL). The IMC process substantially improves the agreement between CL predictions and observed data (in the context of gully catchment landscape evolution), surpassing both uncalibrated and manual approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscientific model development
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-803-2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Introducing Iterative Model Calibration (IMC) v1.0: a generalizable framework for numerical model calibration with a CAESAR-Lisflood case study

Clinton Fookes, Kien Nguyen, Chayan Banerjee, Tom Coulthard et al.
1 citations
Geoscientific model development
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.82
article

Introducing Iterative Model Calibration (IMC) v1.0: a generalizable framework for numerical model calibration with a CAESAR-Lisflood case study

Clinton Fookes, Kien Nguyen, Chayan Banerjee, Tom Coulthard, G. R. Hancock
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. In geosciences, including hydrology and geomorphology, the reliance on numerical models necessitates the precise calibration of their parameters to effectively translate information from observed to unobserved settings. Traditional calibration techniques, however, are marked by poor generalizability, demanding significant manual labor for data preparation and the calibration process itself. Moreover, the utility of machine-learning-based and data-driven approaches is curtailed by the requirement for the numerical model to be differentiable for optimization purposes, which challenges their generalizability across different models. Furthermore, the potential of freely available geomorphological data remains underexploited in existing methodologies. In response to these challenges, we introduce a generalizable framework for calibrating numerical models, with a particular focus on geomorphological models, named Iterative Model Calibration (IMC). This approach efficiently identifies the optimal set of parameters for a given numerical model through a strategy based on a Gaussian neighborhood algorithm. Through experiments, we demonstrate the efficacy of IMC in calibrating the widely used landscape evolution model CAESAR-Lisflood (CL). The IMC process substantially improves the agreement between CL predictions and observed data (in the context of gully catchment landscape evolution), surpassing both uncalibrated and manual approaches.

Geoscientific model developmentVol. 18(3)
Queensland University of Technology (AU), University of Hull (GB), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Advance Queensland
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.