Apollo Impact Melts Record a Rapidly Declining Impact Rate in the Late Imbrian

Abstract Crater chronology functions are used to estimate absolute surface ages using the number density of observed craters. The calibration of chronology functions is done using crater counts on regions with radiometrically dated samples. Both the Neukum Production Function (NPF) and Robbins Production Function (RPF) contain lunar chronology functions anchored by Apollo and Luna samples that have measured absolute ages and are known to be from surfaces with measured crater densities. However, these functions were constructed using different data and assumptions for their respective crater counts, and their functions differ in the rate of decline during the Imbrian period (3–3.9 Ga). In particular, the RPF suggests that the decline in impact rate was much more rapid than the decline suggested by the NPF. We use a numerical impact bombardment model called CTEM to track the production and transportation of impact melts. Using CTEM, we simulated the bombardment history of the Moon under each chronology function, and calculated the age distribution of impact melts mixed in the top meter of regolith at locations corresponding to the Apollo 14–17 landing sites. These results were then compared to the age distribution of Apollo impact melts. We find the rapid decline suggested by the RPF to be a better match to the age distribution of Apollo impact melts than the gradual decline of the NPF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024je008722
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Astro and Planetary Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Apollo Impact Melts Record a Rapidly Declining Impact Rate in the Late Imbrian

Ya‐Huei Huang, Marissa M. Tremblay, Austin M. Blevins, Jun Du et al.
1 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
Astro and Planetary Science
1.15
article

Apollo Impact Melts Record a Rapidly Declining Impact Rate in the Late Imbrian

Ya‐Huei Huang, Marissa M. Tremblay, Austin M. Blevins, Jun Du, David A. Minton, C. I. Fassett
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Crater chronology functions are used to estimate absolute surface ages using the number density of observed craters. The calibration of chronology functions is done using crater counts on regions with radiometrically dated samples. Both the Neukum Production Function (NPF) and Robbins Production Function (RPF) contain lunar chronology functions anchored by Apollo and Luna samples that have measured absolute ages and are known to be from surfaces with measured crater densities. However, these functions were constructed using different data and assumptions for their respective crater counts, and their functions differ in the rate of decline during the Imbrian period (3–3.9 Ga). In particular, the RPF suggests that the decline in impact rate was much more rapid than the decline suggested by the NPF. We use a numerical impact bombardment model called CTEM to track the production and transportation of impact melts. Using CTEM, we simulated the bombardment history of the Moon under each chronology function, and calculated the age distribution of impact melts mixed in the top meter of regolith at locations corresponding to the Apollo 14–17 landing sites. These results were then compared to the age distribution of Apollo impact melts. We find the rapid decline suggested by the RPF to be a better match to the age distribution of Apollo impact melts than the gradual decline of the NPF.

Journal of Geophysical Research PlanetsVol. 130(2)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Astro and Planetary Science
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.