A maximum likelihood approach for uncertain volumes in the additive reserving model

Abstract The additive reserving model assumes the existence of volume measures such that the corresponding expected loss ratios are identical for all accident years. While classical literature assumes these volumes are known, in practice, accurate volume measures are often unavailable. The issue of uncertain volume measures in the additive model was addressed in a generalization of the loss ratio method published in 2018. The derivation is rather complex and the method is computationally intensive, especially for large loss development triangles. This paper introduces an alternative approach that leverages the well-established EM algorithm, significantly reducing computational requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astin Bulletin
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2025.2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Probability and Risk Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A maximum likelihood approach for uncertain volumes in the additive reserving model

Ulrich Riegel
1 citations
Astin Bulletin
Probability and Risk Models
2.11
article

A maximum likelihood approach for uncertain volumes in the additive reserving model

Ulrich Riegel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The additive reserving model assumes the existence of volume measures such that the corresponding expected loss ratios are identical for all accident years. While classical literature assumes these volumes are known, in practice, accurate volume measures are often unavailable. The issue of uncertain volume measures in the additive model was addressed in a generalization of the loss ratio method published in 2018. The derivation is rather complex and the method is computationally intensive, especially for large loss development triangles. This paper introduces an alternative approach that leverages the well-established EM algorithm, significantly reducing computational requirements.

Astin BulletinVol. 55(2)
Munich Re (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Probability and Risk Models
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.