Guideline for ethics review of clinical trials

Abstract This article is the first ethical review technical guideline in the field of oncology in China, compiled by the Medical Ethics Society of China Anti-Cancer Association and jointly completed by 104 national ethics review experts in accordance with a series of Chinese laws and regulations. The document, taking into account the national conditions of China and from an integrated perspective, for the first time proposes a comprehensive ethical review of clinical research from five dimensions: "benefit-risk assessment, foster innovation, full process risk control, safeguard the right and interests of subjects by law, and Achieve gains in both survival duration and quality of life." The guideline emphasizes that benefit-risk assessment should be the primary task of ethical review in clinical trials, proposes trial designs that balance science and ethics to promote pharmaceutical innovation, and requires proactive tracking review to control risks in the trial process. It advocates for the collective protection of the rights and interests of research participants in accordance with the law and emphasizes that the dual benefits of research participants' survival time and quality of life are the goals and missions of ethical review. The publication of this article aims to provide ethical guidelines and operational technical guidance for the ethical review of clinical research in the field of oncology in China. The guideline, grounded in practicality, clarifies the composition and operational mechanisms of the ethics review committee and particularly emphasizes the full process review that pays close attention to and protects the rights and interests of research participants through informed consent, research protocol review, protection of vulnerable groups, benefit-risk assessment, privacy and security review, and tracking review. The document also provides detailed explanations of the operational procedures and key points for important aspects such as review focus and tracking review. To ensure that this guideline is in line with the latest research trends and more referential, the article also covers key issues such as the recruitment of research participants, ethical issues in medical device clinical research, and ethical review of investigator-initiated clinical research. Through a comprehensive analysis of these contents, the document provides comprehensive guidance and recommendations for ethical review in oncology clinical research, aiming to promote the ethical and scientific nature of clinical research and to ensure that the rights and interests of research participants are protected to the greatest extent possible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Holistic Integrative Oncology
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44178-024-00122-8
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guideline for ethics review of clinical trials

Ming‐Huang Hong, Zhao Yan
Holistic Integrative Oncology
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
article

Guideline for ethics review of clinical trials

Ming‐Huang Hong, Zhao Yan
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article is the first ethical review technical guideline in the field of oncology in China, compiled by the Medical Ethics Society of China Anti-Cancer Association and jointly completed by 104 national ethics review experts in accordance with a series of Chinese laws and regulations. The document, taking into account the national conditions of China and from an integrated perspective, for the first time proposes a comprehensive ethical review of clinical research from five dimensions: "benefit-risk assessment, foster innovation, full process risk control, safeguard the right and interests of subjects by law, and Achieve gains in both survival duration and quality of life." The guideline emphasizes that benefit-risk assessment should be the primary task of ethical review in clinical trials, proposes trial designs that balance science and ethics to promote pharmaceutical innovation, and requires proactive tracking review to control risks in the trial process. It advocates for the collective protection of the rights and interests of research participants in accordance with the law and emphasizes that the dual benefits of research participants' survival time and quality of life are the goals and missions of ethical review. The publication of this article aims to provide ethical guidelines and operational technical guidance for the ethical review of clinical research in the field of oncology in China. The guideline, grounded in practicality, clarifies the composition and operational mechanisms of the ethics review committee and particularly emphasizes the full process review that pays close attention to and protects the rights and interests of research participants through informed consent, research protocol review, protection of vulnerable groups, benefit-risk assessment, privacy and security review, and tracking review. The document also provides detailed explanations of the operational procedures and key points for important aspects such as review focus and tracking review. To ensure that this guideline is in line with the latest research trends and more referential, the article also covers key issues such as the recruitment of research participants, ethical issues in medical device clinical research, and ethical review of investigator-initiated clinical research. Through a comprehensive analysis of these contents, the document provides comprehensive guidance and recommendations for ethical review in oncology clinical research, aiming to promote the ethical and scientific nature of clinical research and to ensure that the rights and interests of research participants are protected to the greatest extent possible.

Holistic Integrative OncologyVol. 4(1)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (CN), Chinese Anti-Cancer Association (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.