“In What Society Do Fictional Characters Speak? Identifying and Discussing Theoretical Challenges in Sociolinguistic Analyses of Literature

This article examines the use of literary fiction as a source of data for analysing linguistic patterns in social contexts. By highlighting two interconnected methodological challenges in sociolinguistic studies of literary fiction, this study aims to foster interdisciplinary dialogue on study designs and methods. Building on previous unresolved discussions, it is argued that, firstly, studies that are limited to identifying a fictional text’s mimetic function and drawing real-world-related conclusions from that text risk circular reasoning, thereby contributing little new knowledge. Secondly, the structural unreliability and ambiguity of fictional dialogue often make it problematic to incorporate into sociolinguistic analyses unless its specific conditions are considered. Using scholarly articles as examples, the discussion addresses these challenges to better integrate literary studies and sociolinguistics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24193/mjcst.2024.18.07
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“In What Society Do Fictional Characters Speak? Identifying and Discussing Theoretical Challenges in Sociolinguistic Analyses of Literature

Karl Ågerup
Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

“In What Society Do Fictional Characters Speak? Identifying and Discussing Theoretical Challenges in Sociolinguistic Analyses of Literature

Karl Ågerup
article en

Abstract

This article examines the use of literary fiction as a source of data for analysing linguistic patterns in social contexts. By highlighting two interconnected methodological challenges in sociolinguistic studies of literary fiction, this study aims to foster interdisciplinary dialogue on study designs and methods. Building on previous unresolved discussions, it is argued that, firstly, studies that are limited to identifying a fictional text’s mimetic function and drawing real-world-related conclusions from that text risk circular reasoning, thereby contributing little new knowledge. Secondly, the structural unreliability and ambiguity of fictional dialogue often make it problematic to incorporate into sociolinguistic analyses unless its specific conditions are considered. Using scholarly articles as examples, the discussion addresses these challenges to better integrate literary studies and sociolinguistics.

Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and TheoryVol. 10(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.