Improving User Privacy in Practical Quantum Private Query with Group Honesty Checking

Abstract Current cheat‐sensitive security level of user privacy in quantum private query (QPQ) is far from meeting its ideal requirement. Dishonest database trying to elicit user privacy can only be (delayedly) detected after the finish of the protocol with merely a nonzero probability. Worse yet, no estimation of (i.e., the success probability of dishonest database's cheating) has been given till now. Such estimation is quite necessary because a significant means frangible user privacy especially in the cheat‐sensitive security model. Here, of the first and best‐known quantum‐key‐distribution (QKD)‐based QPQ protocol proposed by Jakobi et al. is estimated, which shows that dishonest database can elicit user privacy with significant probability (e.g., as high as 42.8% for database size ) while such cheating can only be (delayedly) detected with probability 50 %. Common strategy to improve user privacy, i.e., adding honesty checking to detect malicious database may hurt the privacy of the other party, i.e. database security. To solve this problem, a new group honesty checking is proposed, which will not hurt database security and can reduce $ to a very small value (e.g. 0.26% for database size 10000), thus assuring high user privacy (note that = 0 means ideal user privacy).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Quantum Technologies
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.202400429
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Quantum Information and Cryptography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving User Privacy in Practical Quantum Private Query with Group Honesty Checking

Qingle Wang, Chun‐Yan Wei, Tian‐Yin Wang, Xiao‐Qiu Cai
3 citations
Advanced Quantum Technologies
Quantum Information and Cryptography
7.44
article

Improving User Privacy in Practical Quantum Private Query with Group Honesty Checking

Qingle Wang, Chun‐Yan Wei, Tian‐Yin Wang, Xiao‐Qiu Cai
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Current cheat‐sensitive security level of user privacy in quantum private query (QPQ) is far from meeting its ideal requirement. Dishonest database trying to elicit user privacy can only be (delayedly) detected after the finish of the protocol with merely a nonzero probability. Worse yet, no estimation of (i.e., the success probability of dishonest database's cheating) has been given till now. Such estimation is quite necessary because a significant means frangible user privacy especially in the cheat‐sensitive security model. Here, of the first and best‐known quantum‐key‐distribution (QKD)‐based QPQ protocol proposed by Jakobi et al. is estimated, which shows that dishonest database can elicit user privacy with significant probability (e.g., as high as 42.8% for database size ) while such cheating can only be (delayedly) detected with probability 50 %. Common strategy to improve user privacy, i.e., adding honesty checking to detect malicious database may hurt the privacy of the other party, i.e. database security. To solve this problem, a new group honesty checking is proposed, which will not hurt database security and can reduce $ to a very small value (e.g. 0.26% for database size 10000), thus assuring high user privacy (note that = 0 means ideal user privacy).

Advanced Quantum TechnologiesVol. 8(3)
North China Electric Power University (CN), Luoyang Normal University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Quantum Information and Cryptography
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.