Oil Recovery from Tight Reservoirs during Natural Depletion and Cyclic Gas Injection: An Experimental Study Using Live Fluids on a Fractured Reservoir Whole Core Sample

This study presents a highly novel and meticulously designed experimental approach to investigate oil recovery due to natural depletion and cyclic huff-n-puff gas injection in fractured, ultratight reservoirs. To this end, we performed a series of core-flooding experiments on a fractured reservoir whole core sample under elevated pressure and temperature conditions, and using the reservoir live fluids. The whole core setup provides a sufficiently large pore volume in low-porosity core samples and helps minimize uncertainties associated with fluid saturation measurements. The experimental procedure included flow experiments that eventually restored the core back to the reservoir conditions, in terms of pressure, temperature, and fluid saturation, in the presence of propped/unpropped fractures. The core sample was subsequently subjected to several depletion stages to pressures above and below the bubble point pressure. Ultimately, a cyclic huff-n-puff gas injection was employed to quantify incremental oil production after the depletion processes. An initial depletion of 13.75 MPa at a pore pressure above the bubble point resulted in a recovery of approximately 5.8% of the original oil in place (OOIP). This value was consistent with the theoretical estimate based on the rock compressibility and fluid expansion. As the pore pressure dropped below the bubble point, the hydrocarbon gas evolved from the oil phase in the matrix and displaced oil toward the fracture by the solution gas drive mechanism, eventually resulting in an additional recovery of 12.71% of OOIP. After the primary production, a single huff-n-puff gas injection cycle was conducted over the same pressure range of the depletion process, which yielded an incremental recovery of nearly 8% of OOIP. This finding clearly highlighted the promisingly profitable oil volume additionally recovered from the tight matrix system by the huff-n-puff gas injection mode. It was also observed that a subsequent cycle of gas injection did not significantly increase oil production, which indicated that the initial cycle effectively maximized the recovery potential in this ultratight reservoir system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy & Fuels
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c05329
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oil Recovery from Tight Reservoirs during Natural Depletion and Cyclic Gas Injection: An Experimental Study Using Live Fluids on a Fractured Reservoir Whole Core Sample

Morteza Akbarabadi, Si Le Van, Mahdi Khishvand, Mohammad Piri et al.
4 citations
Energy & Fuels
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
2.85
article

Oil Recovery from Tight Reservoirs during Natural Depletion and Cyclic Gas Injection: An Experimental Study Using Live Fluids on a Fractured Reservoir Whole Core Sample

Morteza Akbarabadi, Si Le Van, Mahdi Khishvand, Mohammad Piri, Nagi Nagarajan
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study presents a highly novel and meticulously designed experimental approach to investigate oil recovery due to natural depletion and cyclic huff-n-puff gas injection in fractured, ultratight reservoirs. To this end, we performed a series of core-flooding experiments on a fractured reservoir whole core sample under elevated pressure and temperature conditions, and using the reservoir live fluids. The whole core setup provides a sufficiently large pore volume in low-porosity core samples and helps minimize uncertainties associated with fluid saturation measurements. The experimental procedure included flow experiments that eventually restored the core back to the reservoir conditions, in terms of pressure, temperature, and fluid saturation, in the presence of propped/unpropped fractures. The core sample was subsequently subjected to several depletion stages to pressures above and below the bubble point pressure. Ultimately, a cyclic huff-n-puff gas injection was employed to quantify incremental oil production after the depletion processes. An initial depletion of 13.75 MPa at a pore pressure above the bubble point resulted in a recovery of approximately 5.8% of the original oil in place (OOIP). This value was consistent with the theoretical estimate based on the rock compressibility and fluid expansion. As the pore pressure dropped below the bubble point, the hydrocarbon gas evolved from the oil phase in the matrix and displaced oil toward the fracture by the solution gas drive mechanism, eventually resulting in an additional recovery of 12.71% of OOIP. After the primary production, a single huff-n-puff gas injection cycle was conducted over the same pressure range of the depletion process, which yielded an incremental recovery of nearly 8% of OOIP. This finding clearly highlighted the promisingly profitable oil volume additionally recovered from the tight matrix system by the huff-n-puff gas injection mode. It was also observed that a subsequent cycle of gas injection did not significantly increase oil production, which indicated that the initial cycle effectively maximized the recovery potential in this ultratight reservoir system.

Energy & FuelsVol. 39(7)
University of Wyoming (US), Hess (United States) (US)
Hess Corporation, University of Wyoming
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
2.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.