Distinguishing electrotensile strain and electrobending strain

Electrobending, an emerging phenomenon in electroactive ceramics, has recently gained significant interest; however, existing measurement methods often confound electrotensile and electrobending strains, leading to ambiguity. This study distinguishes electrotensile and electrobending strains in KNN ceramics by examining thickness, frequency, temperature, and directional dependencies, identifying a critical thickness threshold of 600 μm for electrobending in samples of 8.5 mm diameter. This threshold establishes a clear distinction between electrostriction and electrobending within the KNN system and provides a benchmark that can be applied to other systems through similar methodologies. Additionally, new electrobending parameters are defined to assess bending deformation, addressing recent misinterpretations of “giant strain” and advancing electrostrain research by introducing an electrobending framework.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advanced Ceramics
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26599/jac.2025.9221048
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinguishing electrotensile strain and electrobending strain

Yejing Dai, Bin Li, S F Tian
5 citations
Journal of Advanced Ceramics
Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
4.32
article

Distinguishing electrotensile strain and electrobending strain

Yejing Dai, Bin Li, S F Tian
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Electrobending, an emerging phenomenon in electroactive ceramics, has recently gained significant interest; however, existing measurement methods often confound electrotensile and electrobending strains, leading to ambiguity. This study distinguishes electrotensile and electrobending strains in KNN ceramics by examining thickness, frequency, temperature, and directional dependencies, identifying a critical thickness threshold of 600 μm for electrobending in samples of 8.5 mm diameter. This threshold establishes a clear distinction between electrostriction and electrobending within the KNN system and provides a benchmark that can be applied to other systems through similar methodologies. Additionally, new electrobending parameters are defined to assess bending deformation, addressing recent misinterpretations of “giant strain” and advancing electrostrain research by introducing an electrobending framework.

Journal of Advanced CeramicsVol. 14(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
4.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.