Flight style and time–activity budgets of the smallest petrels

Procellariforms are the most oceanic among birds, regularly embarking on the longest journeys in the animal kingdom to find food over an apparently featureless sea surface. To minimize energy expenditure, many species harness wind energy through dynamic soaring, extracting kinetic energy from the wind shear. The smallest members of this order, storm petrels, have functional traits that prevent this type of locomotion, and are predicted to rely on flapping flight despite their high motility. However, theoretical predictions have never been validated and their flight strategy and activity budgets are unclear. We hypothesized that, as the benefits of dynamic soaring are out of reach, these birds should rely on gliding to some extent to sustain their long-ranging movements and save energy. To test our hypothesis we used, for the first time, miniaturized inertial measurement units on one of the world's smallest seabirds, the Mediterranean storm petrel (Hydrobates pelagicus melitensis). We demonstrate that these small seafarers spend 78% of the time flying during their foraging trips, with wingbeat frequencies up to 15 Hz. During transiting flight, they flap their wings at high frequency (mean±s.d.: 8.8±0.8 Hz) for 91% of the time, gliding sporadically and only for an instant (mean±s.d.: 0.11±0.17 s). Flight activity was high during the night and early morning, while they rested on the sea in the central hours of the day. Overall, our results reveal a peculiar locomotory strategy among procellariforms and raise questions about how they can energetically sustain foraging trips spanning hundreds of kilometres.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.249719
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Avian ecology and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flight style and time–activity budgets of the smallest petrels

Diego Rubolini, Federico De Pascalis, Valeria Jennings, Jacopo Giuseppe Cecere et al.
3 citations
Journal of Experimental Biology
Avian ecology and behavior
5.15
article

Flight style and time–activity budgets of the smallest petrels

Diego Rubolini, Federico De Pascalis, Valeria Jennings, Jacopo Giuseppe Cecere, Francesco Ventura, David Grémillet, Andrea Benvenuti
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Procellariforms are the most oceanic among birds, regularly embarking on the longest journeys in the animal kingdom to find food over an apparently featureless sea surface. To minimize energy expenditure, many species harness wind energy through dynamic soaring, extracting kinetic energy from the wind shear. The smallest members of this order, storm petrels, have functional traits that prevent this type of locomotion, and are predicted to rely on flapping flight despite their high motility. However, theoretical predictions have never been validated and their flight strategy and activity budgets are unclear. We hypothesized that, as the benefits of dynamic soaring are out of reach, these birds should rely on gliding to some extent to sustain their long-ranging movements and save energy. To test our hypothesis we used, for the first time, miniaturized inertial measurement units on one of the world's smallest seabirds, the Mediterranean storm petrel (Hydrobates pelagicus melitensis). We demonstrate that these small seafarers spend 78% of the time flying during their foraging trips, with wingbeat frequencies up to 15 Hz. During transiting flight, they flap their wings at high frequency (mean±s.d.: 8.8±0.8 Hz) for 91% of the time, gliding sporadically and only for an instant (mean±s.d.: 0.11±0.17 s). Flight activity was high during the night and early morning, while they rested on the sea in the central hours of the day. Overall, our results reveal a peculiar locomotory strategy among procellariforms and raise questions about how they can energetically sustain foraging trips spanning hundreds of kilometres.

Journal of Experimental BiologyVol. 228(6)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Cape Town (ZA), École Pratique des Hautes Études (FR), University of Milan (IT), Université de Montpellier (FR), Foro Italico University of Rome (IT), Centre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive (FR), Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (IT), Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies (IT), Water Research Institute (IT), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Avian ecology and behavior
5.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.