Evaluation of Bladder Wash as an Alternative Specimen for Postmortem Toxicology: Comparison to Screening Results of Urine and Kidney Tissue

Urine specimens represent the gold standard for screening analyses in forensic toxicology, but they are not always available postmortem. In this case, alternative specimens must be considered. The current study aimed to systematically evaluate bladder wash (BW) as an interesting, but largely unexplored specimen for screening in FT, comparing drug detection in BW against urine and kidney tissue (KT) in authentic cases. The study included 60 consecutive postmortem cases. BW was obtained by injecting 10 mL of a 0.9% NaCl solution into the empty bladder and sampling the entire fluid with the same syringe. KT (ca. 5 g, grinded) was placed into a tube of dialysis membrane and left for dialysis against water (3×, 40-80 mL, 24 h), followed by evaporation/reconstitution. All specimens were analyzed by immunoassay, an untargeted LC-MS<sup>n</sup> screening approach and a targeted LC-MS/MS analysis. In total, 95 different compounds from the drug classes of, among others, stimulants, opiates/opioids, benzodiazepines, antidepressants, and antipsychotics could be detected. Sensitivity for drug detection in BW using immunoassay or untargeted MS/MS was lower than for urine but comparable to that of KT, which is in line with much lower drug concentrations in these matrices compared with urine. Applying a targeted LC-MS/MS method or a more concentrated sample preparation workflow could increase detection sensitivity in BW. Given the easier handling of BW in the laboratory (identical to urine), its use proved superior to KT and represents a promising new strategy for cases without available urine samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drug Testing and Analysis
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3861
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Bladder Wash as an Alternative Specimen for Postmortem Toxicology: Comparison to Screening Results of Urine and Kidney Tissue

Lana Brockbals, Thomas Kræmer, Andrea Eva Steuer, Stephan A. Bolliger et al.
2 citations
Drug Testing and Analysis
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
2.61
article

Evaluation of Bladder Wash as an Alternative Specimen for Postmortem Toxicology: Comparison to Screening Results of Urine and Kidney Tissue

Lana Brockbals, Thomas Kræmer, Andrea Eva Steuer, Stephan A. Bolliger, Sandra N. Poetzsch
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Urine specimens represent the gold standard for screening analyses in forensic toxicology, but they are not always available postmortem. In this case, alternative specimens must be considered. The current study aimed to systematically evaluate bladder wash (BW) as an interesting, but largely unexplored specimen for screening in FT, comparing drug detection in BW against urine and kidney tissue (KT) in authentic cases. The study included 60 consecutive postmortem cases. BW was obtained by injecting 10 mL of a 0.9% NaCl solution into the empty bladder and sampling the entire fluid with the same syringe. KT (ca. 5 g, grinded) was placed into a tube of dialysis membrane and left for dialysis against water (3×, 40-80 mL, 24 h), followed by evaporation/reconstitution. All specimens were analyzed by immunoassay, an untargeted LC-MS<sup>n</sup> screening approach and a targeted LC-MS/MS analysis. In total, 95 different compounds from the drug classes of, among others, stimulants, opiates/opioids, benzodiazepines, antidepressants, and antipsychotics could be detected. Sensitivity for drug detection in BW using immunoassay or untargeted MS/MS was lower than for urine but comparable to that of KT, which is in line with much lower drug concentrations in these matrices compared with urine. Applying a targeted LC-MS/MS method or a more concentrated sample preparation workflow could increase detection sensitivity in BW. Given the easier handling of BW in the laboratory (identical to urine), its use proved superior to KT and represents a promising new strategy for cases without available urine samples.

Drug Testing and AnalysisVol. 17(9)
University of Zurich (CH)
Universität Zürich
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
2.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.