High-Resolution Anoscopy Referral Rates Adopting Different Anal Cancer Screening Strategies for Men Who Have Sex with Men

The International Anal Neoplasia Society (IANS) has generated recommendations for anal cancer screening, identifying men who have sex with men (MSM) living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV; MSM-LWH) ≥35 years and MSM not living with HIV (MSM-noHIV) ≥45 years as groups to prioritize. As high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) availability is still limited across Europe, a retrospective study was conducted to estimate the potential HRA referral rates of the Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI)/HIV center of a European capital city using IANS-recommended strategies. The study included participants in a program for the surveillance of anal intraepithelial neoplasia and anal human papillomavirus (HPV) natural history. MSM-LWH ≥35 years and MSM-noHIV ≥45 years with valid results for liquid-based anal cytology and HPV test at baseline were included. The following strategies were evaluated: cytology as a standalone test or with high-risk HPV (hrHPV) triage; hrHPV (with/without HPV16 genotyping) as a standalone test or with cytology triage; and cotesting with cytology and hrHPV (with/without HPV16 genotyping). Overall, 307 MSM were included (244 LWH, 79.5%). hrHPV as a standalone test led to the highest referral rate in both MSM-LWH and MSM-noHIV (74.6% and 55.6%, respectively). Cytology with hrHPV triage (without genotyping) and hrHPV with cytology triage resulted in the same referral rates (44.3% in MSM-LWH and 27.0% in MSM-noHIV). In settings with insufficient HRA capacity, only high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) or atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude HSIL (4.9% and 9.5% for MSM-LWH and MSM-noHIV, respectively) and HPV16+ MSM (27.0% and 20.6%, respectively) would be referred to HRA. Adoption of IANS recommendations should balance the sensitivity of the screening algorithm and the HRA referral rate because the latter is a matter of concern in settings with limited HRA capacity. Prevention Relevance: Adopting the recent IANS recommendations for anal cancer screening in MSM may be challenging when HRA availability is limited. Estimating the HRA referral rates we would have using 12 different screening algorithms, we highlighted that application of these recommendations implies a careful analysis of the local resource capacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Prevention Research
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.capr-24-0435
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-Resolution Anoscopy Referral Rates Adopting Different Anal Cancer Screening Strategies for Men Who Have Sex with Men

Francesca Rollo, Mauro Zaccarelli, Alessandra Latini, Paolo Giorgi Rossi et al.
2 citations
Cancer Prevention Research
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
2.71
article

High-Resolution Anoscopy Referral Rates Adopting Different Anal Cancer Screening Strategies for Men Who Have Sex with Men

Francesca Rollo, Mauro Zaccarelli, Alessandra Latini, Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Eugenia Giuliani, Massimo Giuliani, Maria Gabriella Donà, Maria Benevolo, Laura Gianserra, Christof Stingone
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The International Anal Neoplasia Society (IANS) has generated recommendations for anal cancer screening, identifying men who have sex with men (MSM) living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV; MSM-LWH) ≥35 years and MSM not living with HIV (MSM-noHIV) ≥45 years as groups to prioritize. As high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) availability is still limited across Europe, a retrospective study was conducted to estimate the potential HRA referral rates of the Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI)/HIV center of a European capital city using IANS-recommended strategies. The study included participants in a program for the surveillance of anal intraepithelial neoplasia and anal human papillomavirus (HPV) natural history. MSM-LWH ≥35 years and MSM-noHIV ≥45 years with valid results for liquid-based anal cytology and HPV test at baseline were included. The following strategies were evaluated: cytology as a standalone test or with high-risk HPV (hrHPV) triage; hrHPV (with/without HPV16 genotyping) as a standalone test or with cytology triage; and cotesting with cytology and hrHPV (with/without HPV16 genotyping). Overall, 307 MSM were included (244 LWH, 79.5%). hrHPV as a standalone test led to the highest referral rate in both MSM-LWH and MSM-noHIV (74.6% and 55.6%, respectively). Cytology with hrHPV triage (without genotyping) and hrHPV with cytology triage resulted in the same referral rates (44.3% in MSM-LWH and 27.0% in MSM-noHIV). In settings with insufficient HRA capacity, only high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) or atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude HSIL (4.9% and 9.5% for MSM-LWH and MSM-noHIV, respectively) and HPV16+ MSM (27.0% and 20.6%, respectively) would be referred to HRA. Adoption of IANS recommendations should balance the sensitivity of the screening algorithm and the HRA referral rate because the latter is a matter of concern in settings with limited HRA capacity. Prevention Relevance: Adopting the recent IANS recommendations for anal cancer screening in MSM may be challenging when HRA availability is limited. Estimating the HRA referral rates we would have using 12 different screening algorithms, we highlighted that application of these recommendations implies a careful analysis of the local resource capacity.

Cancer Prevention ResearchVol. 18(5)
Azienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia (IT), National Cancer Institute (MY), San Gallicano Hospital (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT), Instituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena (IT)
Ministero della Salute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
2.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.