Liberating Human Rights from Group Narcissism

ABSTRACT: Many people are forced to contend with the disjunction between (1) human rights as a universal concept applying to everyone despite time and location and (2) human rights as a primarily Western invention that does not necessarily apply to every cultural group. This disjunction can be especially troubling to Westerners, who may fear they are imposing their cultural norms on other nations in an act of group narcissism. This article addresses this disjunction by explaining culture in the context of human rights. Furthermore, it proposes adaptive ethnocentrism (in contrast to tribal ethnocentrism) as a means of liberating people to promote human rights while also enabling them to avoid group narcissism. Adaptive ethnocentrism is distinct from tribal ethnocentrism in that people are not expected to automatically accept the customs of the group they happen to belong to. Instead, people are expected to critically examine their customs, as well as the customs of other people they encounter, and adapt their way of life according to the customs they judge to be the best.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human Rights Quarterly
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2025.a951569
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Liberating Human Rights from Group Narcissism

Simon Greathead, Timothy McKeon
Human Rights Quarterly
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

Liberating Human Rights from Group Narcissism

Simon Greathead, Timothy McKeon
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Many people are forced to contend with the disjunction between (1) human rights as a universal concept applying to everyone despite time and location and (2) human rights as a primarily Western invention that does not necessarily apply to every cultural group. This disjunction can be especially troubling to Westerners, who may fear they are imposing their cultural norms on other nations in an act of group narcissism. This article addresses this disjunction by explaining culture in the context of human rights. Furthermore, it proposes adaptive ethnocentrism (in contrast to tribal ethnocentrism) as a means of liberating people to promote human rights while also enabling them to avoid group narcissism. Adaptive ethnocentrism is distinct from tribal ethnocentrism in that people are not expected to automatically accept the customs of the group they happen to belong to. Instead, people are expected to critically examine their customs, as well as the customs of other people they encounter, and adapt their way of life according to the customs they judge to be the best.

Human Rights QuarterlyVol. 47(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Liberating Human Rights from Group Narcissism — Simon Greathead, Timothy McKeon · Human Rights Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS