Unveiling the Truth in Pain: Neural and Behavioral Distinctions Between Genuine and Deceptive Pain

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Fake pain expressions are more intense, prolonged, and include non-pain-related actions compared to genuine ones. Despite these differences, individuals struggle to detect deception in direct tasks (i.e., when asked to detect liars). Regarding neural correlates, while pain observation has been extensively studied, little is known about the neural distinctions between processing genuine, fake, and suppressed pain facial expressions. This study seeks to address this gap using authentic pain stimuli and an implicit emotional processing task. <b>Methods</b>: Twenty-four healthy women underwent an fMRI study, during which they were instructed to complete an implicit gender discrimination task. Stimuli were video clips showing genuine, fake, suppressed pain, and neutral facial expressions. After the scanning session, participants reviewed the stimuli and rated them indirectly according to the intensity of the facial expression (IE) and the intensity of the pain (IP). <b>Results</b>: Mean scores of IE and IP were significantly different for each category. A greater BOLD response for the observation of genuine pain compared to fake pain was observed in the pregenual anterior cingulate cortex (pACC). A parametric analysis showed a correlation between brain activity in the mid-cingulate cortex (aMCC) and the IP ratings. <b>Conclusions</b>: Higher IP ratings for genuine pain expressions and higher IE ratings for fake ones suggest that participants were indirectly able to recognize authenticity in facial expressions. At the neural level, pACC and aMCC appear to be involved in unveiling the genuine vs. fake pain and in coding the intensity of the perceived pain, respectively.