Evaluation of pulpal response at varying remaining dentin thickness in teeth restored with resin bulk fill composite, conventional glass ionomer cement and silver amalgam: Histomorphometric analysis
The study concluded that critical RDT varies for different restorative materials. It was observed that both glass ionomer cement and amalgam demonstrated acceptable biocompatibility when used in deep cavities. At the same time, SDR plus bulk fill composite proved to be the least biocompatible.
Authors
- Madhu Kumar
- Rhythm Bains (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3925-0125)
- Ramesh Bharti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8582-226X)
- Dipti Shastri (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6320-0681)
- Rakesh Kumar Yadav (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0151-4981)
- Promila Verma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2685-0284)
- Ankita Agarwal
Institutions
- King George's Medical University (IN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
- Published
- 2025-02-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.12.020
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Dental materials and restorations
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.35