Comparative Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacological and Pharmacological Treatments for Non-Acute Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Multicenter, Pragmatic, Randomized Controlled, Parallel-Grouped Pilot Study

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> We aimed to compare non-pharmacological (non-PHM) and pharmacological (PHM) treatment for patients with non-acute lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and determine the feasibility of a large-scale study. <b>Methods:</b> This was a two-armed, parallel, multicenter, pragmatic controlled trial performed in South Korea. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans both at the screening stage and the last follow-up. Patients with LDH findings on MRI were randomly assigned to non-PHM and PHM groups. Treatment was administered twice a week for a total of 8 weeks, and follow-up assessments were performed at weeks 9, 13, and 27 post-randomization. The primary outcome was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score. A linear mixed model was used for primary analysis from intention-to-treat perspectives. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated for economic evaluation. <b>Results:</b> Thirty-six patients were enrolled, and thirty-five were included in the final analysis. At Week 9, the difference in ODI scores between the two groups was 5.17 (95% CI: -4.00 to 14.35, <i>p</i> = 0.262), and the numeric rating scale scores for lower back and leg pains were 1.89 (95% CI: 0.68 to 3.10, <i>p</i> = 0.003) and 1.52 (95% CI: 0.27 to 2.77, <i>p</i> = 0.018), respectively, confirming greater improvement in the non-PHM group than in the PHM group. The non-PHM group showed lower costs and higher quality-adjusted life years than the PHM group. The ICER calculated using the EuroQoL-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) was USD 20,926. <b>Conclusions:</b> We confirm the possibility that a non-PHM strategy could be a more effective and cost-effective treatment option than PHM for patients with non-acute lumbar disc herniation. Furthermore, this pilot study confirmed the feasibility of the main study in terms of design and patient compliance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14041204
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacological and Pharmacological Treatments for Non-Acute Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Multicenter, Pragmatic, Randomized Controlled, Parallel-Grouped Pilot Study

Changsop Yang, Yoon Jae Lee, In‐Hyuk Ha, Chang-Hyun Han et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
1.39
article

Comparative Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacological and Pharmacological Treatments for Non-Acute Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Multicenter, Pragmatic, Randomized Controlled, Parallel-Grouped Pilot Study

Changsop Yang, Yoon Jae Lee, In‐Hyuk Ha, Chang-Hyun Han, Jee Young Lee, Jeong Jae Kim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> We aimed to compare non-pharmacological (non-PHM) and pharmacological (PHM) treatment for patients with non-acute lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and determine the feasibility of a large-scale study. <b>Methods:</b> This was a two-armed, parallel, multicenter, pragmatic controlled trial performed in South Korea. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans both at the screening stage and the last follow-up. Patients with LDH findings on MRI were randomly assigned to non-PHM and PHM groups. Treatment was administered twice a week for a total of 8 weeks, and follow-up assessments were performed at weeks 9, 13, and 27 post-randomization. The primary outcome was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score. A linear mixed model was used for primary analysis from intention-to-treat perspectives. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated for economic evaluation. <b>Results:</b> Thirty-six patients were enrolled, and thirty-five were included in the final analysis. At Week 9, the difference in ODI scores between the two groups was 5.17 (95% CI: -4.00 to 14.35, <i>p</i> = 0.262), and the numeric rating scale scores for lower back and leg pains were 1.89 (95% CI: 0.68 to 3.10, <i>p</i> = 0.003) and 1.52 (95% CI: 0.27 to 2.77, <i>p</i> = 0.018), respectively, confirming greater improvement in the non-PHM group than in the PHM group. The non-PHM group showed lower costs and higher quality-adjusted life years than the PHM group. The ICER calculated using the EuroQoL-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) was USD 20,926. <b>Conclusions:</b> We confirm the possibility that a non-PHM strategy could be a more effective and cost-effective treatment option than PHM for patients with non-acute lumbar disc herniation. Furthermore, this pilot study confirmed the feasibility of the main study in terms of design and patient compliance.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(4)
Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine (KR), Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine (KR), Jaseng Medical Foundation (KR), National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital (KR), Korea University of Science and Technology (KR)
Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.