Expert Clinical Interpretation of Continuous Glucose Monitor Reports From Individuals Without Diabetes

High discordance among expert clinicians when interpreting potentially challenging CGM reports for people without diabetes highlights the need for more research in developing normative data for people without diabetes. Future work is required to develop CGM criteria for identifying potentially high-risk individuals who may progress to prediabetes or type 2 diabetes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968251315171
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expert Clinical Interpretation of Continuous Glucose Monitor Reports From Individuals Without Diabetes

Anne L. Peters, Nicole L. Spartano, G. Alexander Fleming, Eleanor Shi et al.
5 citations
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Diabetes Management and Research
6.47
article

Expert Clinical Interpretation of Continuous Glucose Monitor Reports From Individuals Without Diabetes

Anne L. Peters, Nicole L. Spartano, G. Alexander Fleming, Eleanor Shi, Honghuang Lin, Rodolfo Javier Galindo, Viral N. Shah, Michaël Joubert, Viswanathan Mohan, Julia Katharina Mader, Steven V. Edelman, Joanne M. Murabito, M. Cecilia Lansang, Tadej Battelino, Nestoras Mathioudakis, Eugene E. Wright, Devin Steenkamp, Mihail Zilbermint, Howard Wolpert, David T. Ahn, Boris Mankovsky, Kayo Waki, Elias K. Spanakis, Maura E. Walker, Guido Freckmann, David Fei, Brenton Prescott, G Sundaram Venkatesan
article en
5 citations

Abstract

High discordance among expert clinicians when interpreting potentially challenging CGM reports for people without diabetes highlights the need for more research in developing normative data for people without diabetes. Future work is required to develop CGM criteria for identifying potentially high-risk individuals who may progress to prediabetes or type 2 diabetes.

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Boston University (US), University of Southern California (US), Central Piedmont Community College (US), Boston Medical Center (US), Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Miami (US), University of Ljubljana (SI), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), Harper College (US), Universität Ulm (DE), Medical University of Graz (AT), Suburban Hospital (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine (UA), South Piedmont Community College (US), Ljubljana University Medical Centre (SI), University of California San Diego (US), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine (US), Madras Diabetes Research Foundation (IN), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US), Framingham Heart Study (US), VA Maryland Health Care System (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), The University of Tokyo (JP), Université de Caen Normandie (FR)
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Diabetes Management and Research
6.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.