Role of right/left ventricular diameter ratio in therapy selection for high and low intermediate‑risk pulmonary embolism in the Emergency Department

Patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) comprise a significant patient population. Computerized tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) plays a crucial role in diagnosis and determining the prognosis. Right ventricular diameter/left ventricular diameter (RVD/LVD) ratio measured through CTPA provides insight into right ventricular overload. The aim of the present study was to determine the role of RVD/LVD ratio on decision of treatment between high and low intermediate-risk PE. A retrospective observational study was conducted between May 2018 and May 2022 on patients with intermediate-risk PE at the Emergency Department (ED) of a tertiary care hospital. The demographic information, risk factors, vital signs at presentation, laboratory data, CTPA images and treatment modality of the patients were obtained. RVD/LVD was calculated from the CTPA images. All-cause mortality at 24 h, 7 and 30 days were recorded. A total of 127 patients were included. In total, 52 (40.9%) patients were in the low-intermediate risk group, and 75 (59.1%) patients were in the intermediate-high risk group. A total of 54 patients were administered thrombolytic therapy while 73 patients were not. The mean RVD/LVD was 1.35±0.25 in patients who were administered thrombolytic therapy and 1.17±0.34 in those who were not. A significant association was identified between RVD/LVD and the administration of thrombolytic therapy (P<0.001). RVD/LVD and mortality were not significantly correlated (P=0.248). No significant association was found between the administration of thrombolytic therapy and mortality (P=0.569). RVD/LVD assessed through CTPA was found to be significantly decisive for administering thrombolytic therapy but not significantly predictive for mortality in intermediate-risk patients with PE presenting to the ED.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2025.12823
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role of right/left ventricular diameter ratio in therapy selection for high and low intermediate‑risk pulmonary embolism in the Emergency Department

Bedriye Müge Sönmez, E. Karakaya, Gülşen Çığşar, İlker Şirin et al.
1 citations
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
1.87
article

Role of right/left ventricular diameter ratio in therapy selection for high and low intermediate‑risk pulmonary embolism in the Emergency Department

Bedriye Müge Sönmez, E. Karakaya, Gülşen Çığşar, İlker Şirin, İpek Güngör Doğan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) comprise a significant patient population. Computerized tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) plays a crucial role in diagnosis and determining the prognosis. Right ventricular diameter/left ventricular diameter (RVD/LVD) ratio measured through CTPA provides insight into right ventricular overload. The aim of the present study was to determine the role of RVD/LVD ratio on decision of treatment between high and low intermediate-risk PE. A retrospective observational study was conducted between May 2018 and May 2022 on patients with intermediate-risk PE at the Emergency Department (ED) of a tertiary care hospital. The demographic information, risk factors, vital signs at presentation, laboratory data, CTPA images and treatment modality of the patients were obtained. RVD/LVD was calculated from the CTPA images. All-cause mortality at 24 h, 7 and 30 days were recorded. A total of 127 patients were included. In total, 52 (40.9%) patients were in the low-intermediate risk group, and 75 (59.1%) patients were in the intermediate-high risk group. A total of 54 patients were administered thrombolytic therapy while 73 patients were not. The mean RVD/LVD was 1.35±0.25 in patients who were administered thrombolytic therapy and 1.17±0.34 in those who were not. A significant association was identified between RVD/LVD and the administration of thrombolytic therapy (P<0.001). RVD/LVD and mortality were not significantly correlated (P=0.248). No significant association was found between the administration of thrombolytic therapy and mortality (P=0.569). RVD/LVD assessed through CTPA was found to be significantly decisive for administering thrombolytic therapy but not significantly predictive for mortality in intermediate-risk patients with PE presenting to the ED.

Experimental and Therapeutic MedicineVol. 29(4)
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.